I am facing the problem below

                 i have a sequence q_n: n=0 to ∞

                 another sequence is defined as p_n=q_{n-1 ,} n=1 to ∞

                  ...

Hi, I was trying to carry out a Sybolic integration "u1" as below:

> assume(0 < ct, ct < cl);

> u1 := int(int(sin(omega*(ts+ys/ct))*Heaviside(t-ts-ys/ct), ys = H-cl*ts .. ct*ts), ts = H/(cl+ct) .. (H+cl*tau[l])/(cl+ct));

and I use a special case "u1test" to test if u1 is correct:

> u1test := int(int(sin(omega*(ts+(1/3140)*ys))*Heaviside(t-ts-(1/3140)*ys), ys = H-6300*ts .. 3140*ts), ts = H/(6300+3140) .. (H+6300*tau[l])/(6300+3140));

I want to integrate the following two function using Maple, but it returns nothing

how to plot log(-1+e^t) t=0..2*Pi

See attached.  I have stared at this long enough to the point I need some FRESH eyes on this.  Why does MAPLE return FALSE on the last 2 statements

I need to plot a discontinous function based on a previous discontinous function described by the picture:

Attached are results I obtained in MAPLE 12.  Can anyone explain the contradiction?

In short, if I sum from n = 0 to some integer I get a FALSE when testing the equality, which is what I would EXPECT.  However, if I change the integer to a variable to represent that integer such as m--> the result is TRUE?

Note the change in the variable of beta to alpha inside the series expression within the parentheses.

regards

Hello. I wanted to solve a parametric 16*16 determinant. My first question is, whether or not it can be solved?! after that when I tried to open my work in progress I got the following message: "
There were problems during the loading process. Your worksheet may be incomplete". Could someone help me recorver my work? Thanks in advance.

Hi all,

I have a function which Maple is happy to integrate from -100 μm to +100 μm,  but won't do between -60 μm and 100 μm.  Screenshot here:

 http://oi39.tinypic.com/34jdif9.jpg

The graph of the function reveals no obvious reason why it shouldn't be able to integrate from +infinity to -infinity (which I'd like to be able to do) and everything in between:

Hi all,

I try to solve the following nonlinear programming problem:

but this error message appear:

Hello,

I just bought a new PC with Windows 7 Professional 64bit and wanted to install my old Maple 12. I have a notebook with Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit where it runs without any problems. However, Maple 12 does not start whether I put it on compatibility mode or not. There are just two error messages showing up:

http://s14.directupload.net/images/120303/5xwxbl8j.png

http://s14.directupload.net/images/120303/ij8jqfdl.png

Maybe someone can help?

I created a procedure over a year ago to collect earthquake data from the usgs and save it into a file. The procedure pulls data off the internet and saves it in a text file with a date stamp (minus the year - because I haven't been bothered to change it ) in the folder location f:/7 day earthquakes.  Feel free to modify it as you wish.  Here it is, pretty much still in it's original format when I created it.

earthquakedatasave := proc ()
  local a, b, c, d, e, i:

Suppose I have a system of three coupled equations as:

eqn[1] := a*x+b*x^2+c*x^3

eqn[2] := a1*x+b*x^3

eqn[3] := a2*x^2+b2*x^3 = a*x^2

If I simply write

eqs :=( eqn[1], eqn[2], eqn[3])

the equations get coupled.

1. Can I do it using loop structure?

2. Secondly, after coupling suppose I want to collect coefficoent of x, x^2 and x^3 from three equations ang get the equation in form

eq[0]:=a=0,a1=0

is(sum( (1+i)^(k-1), k = 1 .. 8) = sum( (1+i)^(k-1), k = 8 .. 1))
                                                       false

Is that a bug in sum that got fixed in a newer Maple or maybe I missed something?...

Hello everyone. I am new to Maple. I am trying to simplify an expression in Maple. The expression is like:

u := a+b*x+a/x+b*x^7+c

If I use simplify(u) Maple returns the result as:

 (a*x+b*x^2+a+b*x^8+c*x)/x

If I want the result in the form:

u = a*(x+1)/x+b*x*(1+x^6)+c

or

u = a*(1+1/x)+b*x*(1+x^6)+c

How should I proceed? Is it possible to do this?