Maple 2022 Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple 2022

recurssion.mw

NULL

"f(x,t) :=(|Psi|)^(2)"

proc (x, t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; abs(Psi)^2 end proc

(1)

" a(t):=piecewise(0<= t<=1,1.5*t,1<= t<=2,1.5*(2-t))"

proc (t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; piecewise(0 <= t and t <= 1, 1.5*t, 1 <= t and t <= 2, 1.5*(2-t)) end proc

(2)

" y[a](t):=piecewise(0<= t<=0.1,a(t),0.1<= t<=0.2,-a(t))"

proc (t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; piecewise(0 <= t and t <= .1, a(t), .1 <= t and t <= .2, -a(t)) end proc

(3)

"y(t):=y[a](t)+mu(t)"

proc (t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; y[a](t)+mu(t) end proc

(4)

"w(t):=&int;x(t)*f(x,t) &DifferentialD;x"

proc (t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; int(x(t)*f(x, t), x) end proc

(5)

" v(t):=y(t)-w(t)*w(t)"

proc (t) options operator, arrow, function_assign; y(t)-w(t)^2 end proc

(6)

NULL

diff(K(x, t), t) = beta*v(t)*f(x, t)

Error, (in y[a]) too many levels of recursion

 

"map(int, , t)"

Error, invalid function arguments

"map(int,,t)"

 

NULL

Here psi is a general wave function from schrodinger wave equation.

Download recurssion.mw

The problem comes from the link https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/234398-Convert-Maple-Code-To-Python-#comment287424.

We know that when we compile a C or C ++ function, it generates an executable file.  Then we are free from source code.  For example. the function below returns a square matrix A where    "A[i, j]" is the distance from vertex i to vertex j in the graph G. My computer system is Windows.

// C Program for Floyd Warshall Algorithm
#include <stdio.h>

// Number of vertices in the graph
#define V 4

/* Define Infinite as a large enough
  value. This value will be used
  for vertices not connected to each other */
#define INF 99999

// A function to print the solution matrix
void printSolution(int dist[][V]);

// Solves the all-pairs shortest path
// problem using Floyd Warshall algorithm
void floydWarshall (int graph[][V]) {
    /* dist[][] will be the output matrix
      that will finally have the shortest
      distances between every pair of vertices */
    int dist[V][V], i, j, k;

    /* Initialize the solution matrix
      same as input graph matrix. Or
       we can say the initial values of
       shortest distances are based
       on shortest paths considering no
       intermediate vertex. */
    for (i = 0; i < V; i++)
        for (j = 0; j < V; j++)
            dist[i][j] = graph[i][j];

    /* Add all vertices one by one to
      the set of intermediate vertices.
      ---> Before start of an iteration, we
      have shortest distances between all
      pairs of vertices such that the shortest
      distances consider only the
      vertices in set {0, 1, 2, .. k-1} as
      intermediate vertices.
      ----> After the end of an iteration,
      vertex no. k is added to the set of
      intermediate vertices and the set
      becomes {0, 1, 2, .. k} */
    for (k = 0; k < V; k++) {
        // Pick all vertices as source one by one
        for (i = 0; i < V; i++) {
            // Pick all vertices as destination for the
            // above picked source
            for (j = 0; j < V; j++) {
                // If vertex k is on the shortest path from
                // i to j, then update the value of dist[i][j]
                if (dist[i][k] + dist[k][j] < dist[i][j])
                    dist[i][j] = dist[i][k] + dist[k][j];
            }
        }
    }

    // Print the shortest distance matrix
    printSolution(dist);
}

/* A utility function to print solution */
void printSolution(int dist[][V]) {
    printf ("The following matrix shows the shortest distances"
            " between every pair of vertices \n");
    for (int i = 0; i < V; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < V; j++) {
            if (dist[i][j] == INF)
                printf("%7s", "INF");
            else
                printf ("%7d", dist[i][j]);
        }
        printf("\n");
    }
}

// driver program to test above function
int main() {
    /* Let us create the following weighted graph
            10
       (0)------->(3)
        |         /|\
      5 |          |
        |          | 1
       \|/         |
       (1)------->(2)
            3           */
    int graph[V][V] = { {0,   5,  INF, 10},
        {INF, 0,   3, INF},
        {INF, INF, 0,   1},
        {INF, INF, INF, 0}
    };

    // Print the solution
    floydWarshall(graph);
    return 0;
}

 

The above functions will be packaged as the disall.exe , and then we will move them anywhere in my computer and run it in Powershell.  We don't have to deal with the source code unless we want to change it.

I mean can Maple do something like that?

with(GraphTheory);
G := Graph([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], {{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4}, {1, 5}, {2, 3}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {4, 5}});
AllPairsDistance(G);

For exmaple, can I package the above code snippet into an exe file?

Dear All,
I want to extract the coefficients of Chebyshev of an arbitrary function, for example, exp(x). I know that we can use the following command to make a Chebyshev series expansion of exp(x):
chebyshev(exp(x),x);
the above returns the sum of nth Chebyshev polynomials multiplied by Chebyshev coefficients as the following:
1.26606587775201*T(0, x) + 1.13031820798497*T(1, x) + 0.271495339534077*T(2, x) + 0.0443368498486638*T(3, x) + 0.00547424044209371*T(4, x) + 0.000542926311913993*T(5, x) + 0.0000449773229542760*T(6, x) + 3.19843646244580*10^(-6)*T(7, x) + 1.99212480641582*10^(-7)*T(8, x) + 1.10367717095000*10^(-8)*T(9, x) + 5.50589697979079*10^(-10)*T(10, x)

I like to take the coefficients 1.266,1.1303, 0.2714, 0.04433, and so on. How can I do it?
Thanks

Hi,

I am just starting with Maple after using Mathcad for nearly 30 years. I want to recreate something I have used a lot in Mathcad: select certain rows in array based on a specified criterion. For example, I want to save just the rows that have a certain value in a certain column and save the new array for use later. I am slowly learning how to do it Maple--for instance, I learned that I need to change the variable printlevel if I want to get the output from nested loops. 

I currently have the following code:

k := 1;

rows := RowDimension(M);


for i to rows do

   if M[i, 3] = "A" then

      row(out, k) := row(M, i);

       k := k + 1;

   end if;

end do;
out;

 

This doesn't seem to work, though. When I try to display out, I just get the name out instead a matrix of values.

I would appreciate it if someone could give me some idea of what I am doing wrong (with Maple, that is).

Thanks,

John
 

Dear all, 

I'm trying to enter an equation (Navier-Stokes) in Maple using the Physics[Vectors] package. I am having trouble with the term 

$(u\cdot \nabla) u$

but Maple returns an error when entering the commands :

( u_(t,x,y,z) . %Nabla) u_(t,x,y,z)

I tried other combinations of this without success, like :

( u_(t,x,y,z) . %Nabla)(u_(t,x,y,z))

( u_(t,x,y,z) %. %Nabla) u_(t,x,y,z)

( u_(t,x,y,z) %. %Nabla) (u_(t,x,y,z))

Could you please give me some help with this? 

Hello,
I have a small problem with the display of fraction and x_dot at the same time. 

 

This the exemple :

with(Typesetting);
compactdisplay = flase;
Settings(typesetprime = false);
Settings(typesetdot = true);

diff(1/2*LongExpression*x(t), t);

The Results 

when I choose the typesetting level : Extended. I got this result :

And when I choose the typesetting level : Maple Standrad. I got this result 
        

What I  want to have is mix of both, it mean like this 

I have downloaded Maple and install the trial version , i entered the Purchase code  and every thing was done, I did not get any errors , however, while i am trying to open Maple, when I open the software , I see this window which i have uploaded below , and when i click on Active i eneter my purchase code again , and it says it has acitivated and then when i click ok , it exit , what is the issue ?

can you help me ?

This is the problem: My object is getting large with many private methods.

In non-OOP setup, I could make different modules A,B,C and put relevent methods inside each module.

Now I find I can not do this inside the object. All methods have to be flat and at same level. So I lose the benefit of using different name space for different methods.

It will be easier to explain with a simple example. Lets say I have this now

restart;

A:=module() 
    option object; 
    local name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( self, proto, name::string, $)          
         self:-name := name;
    end proc;

    export process_1::static:=proc(_self,$)
       _self:-process_2();
    end proc;

    local process_2::static:=proc(_self,$)
       print("in process_2 ",_self:-name);
    end proc;

end module; 

The above works by having all methods at same level. I can now do 

o:=Object(A,"me");
o:-process_1()

                  "in process_2 ", "me"

But now as the number of private methods increases I want to put a name space around collection of these for better orgnization, but keep all methods logically as part of the object as before.

I change the above to be

restart;

A:=module() 
    option object; 
    local name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( self, proto, name::string, $)          
         self:-name := name;
    end proc;

    export process_1::static:=proc(_self,$)
       o:-B:-process_2();
    end proc;
    
    #method process_2 is now inside a module. 
    local B::static:=module()
       export process_2::static:=proc(_self,$)
           print("in B:-process_2 ",_self:-name);
       end proc;
    end module;

end module; 

Now

o:=Object(A,"me");
o:-process_1()

Gives an error

Error, (in unknown) invalid input: process_2 uses a 1st argument, _self, which is missing

I tried many different combinations, but nothing works.

So right now I have all methods flat. All at same level. But I do not like this setup. Since I lose the nice modular orgnization I had with using different modules with different methods inside different modules.  

Is there a way to have a module inside an object and call its methods from inside the object as if these method were part of the object private method with only differece is adding the module name in between?

So instead of _self:-foo()  I just change it to  _self:-B:-foo() and have both behave the same way?

In C++, one can use what is called a friend class to do this. 

int(int(x^(alpha + 1)*y^(beta + 1)*exp(-(x^2 + y^2)/(4*Pi))/sqrt(x^2 + y^2), x = -R .. R), y = -R..R) assuming x>0, y>0, R>0;

I am trying to evaluate the above symbolic integral but Maple returns the same input in Symbolic form without evaluating it at all. Is there something wrong with my approach?

This is another bizzar behaviour of objects. I created a basic object of type person.  Noticed that after issuing the call copy(object,deep) and not doing anything at all with the result. Just made the call only, then I am not longer able to create new objects of this class. I had to restart the session to be able to create new objects again.

Why?  This seems like something went messy with memory layout. I put a print message in the constructor, and see that this message no longer show up  after the call copy(object,deep) even though this call was not used for any purpose as you see, but to only to see its effect on the session.

Any explanation why one can no longer create new objects after doing this?  Here is the workseet


 

interface(version)

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2022.1, Windows 10, May 26 2022 Build ID 1619613`

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    export name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:=proc(_self,proto, name::string, $)
      print("Enter constructor of person");
      _self:-name := name;
    end proc;
end module;

_m2370471750336

p1:=Object(person,"me");
p1:-name;
do_not_care := copy(p1,deep);  

"Enter constructor of person"

_m2370557462816

"me"

_m2370557440576

p2:=Object(person,"me");  #WHy constructor no long called?
p2:-name;   #this no longer work.

_m2370556941056

""

p3:=Object(person,"me");  #WHy constructor no long called?
p3:-name;   #this no longer work.

_m2370556932032

""

restart;  #had to call restart to fix things.

person:=module()
    option object;
    export name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:=proc(_self,proto, name::string, $)
      print("Enter constructor of person");
      _self:-name := name;
    end proc;
end module;

_m2370471750336

p4:=Object(person,"me");  #now it works again
p4:-name;   

"Enter constructor of person"

_m2370557462816

"me"

 


 

Download deep_call_problem.mw

As I was trying things with Maple OOP, I noticed strange behavior which I do not understand. I'll explain the problem in words first then given an example.

I have Person class. Then made one instance of it. In this class, there is one method which is defined to take in an object of same type as the class itself.

I found when I pass the object itself to its own method, it gives an error that the method expects a second argument of type person which is missing. But it is not missing.

Then when creating a second object of same type, and passing the second object, it worked! 

Why?  Here is MWE. Attached worksheet.  I would have expected same behavior in both cases. EIther both work, or both do not work. As as long as the object being passed is the correct type (person).

It seems in the first case, Maple noticed the object being passed to the method happened to be same object where this method is, and it did not pass it. Hence the missing second argument.  Is this a documented behaviour somewhere? (I made sure to make all method static though, so same code is used by all instances of the class. This is strange error message).
 

interface(version)

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2022.1, Windows 10, May 26 2022 Build ID 1619613`

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    export name::string:="";  

    #--- constructor---
    export ModuleCopy::static:=proc(_self,proto, name::string, $)
      _self:-name := name;
    end proc;

    export process::static:=proc(_self, the_input::person ,$)
       print("in person::process. name = ", the_input:-name);
    end proc;

end module;

_m2370471750496

p:=Object(person,"me");

_m2370557462912

p:-process(p);  #why this fail

Error, invalid input: process uses a 2nd argument, the_input (of type person), which is missing

o:=Object(person,"new_name"); #make new object and try again

_m2370557450944

p:-process(o); #why this OK?

"in person::process. name = ", "new_name"

 


 

Download why_first_call_fail.mw

Update

Ok, I am all set. I found a good way to do this. i.e. pass the object to one of its method. One has to make a copy of the object first and pass the copy. Can't use the same object. This is how I do it now. 

restart;
person:=module() 
    option object;
    export name::string:="";  

     export ModuleCopy::static:= overload( 
     [ 
         proc(_self,proto, $)option overload;
            print("Enter 2 args constructor of person");  
            #do nothing    
         end proc,

         proc(_self,proto, name::string, $) option overload; 
             print("Enter 3 args constructor of person");      
             _self:-name := name;
        end proc
     ]);

    export process::static:=proc(_self, the_input::person,$)
       print("the_input:-name = ",the_input:-name);
    end proc;
    
end module; 


p:=Object(person,"me");
#p:-process(p);  #instead of this do the following
o:=Object(p);
p:-process(o)

Which works and gives

              "Enter 3 args constructor of person"
                  p := Object<<2370600065568>>
              "Enter 2 args constructor of person"
                  o := Object<<2370600048288>>
                   "the_input:-name = ", "me"

So I am now able to pass the object (or rather copy of it) as explicit argument to other methods and other modules.  I am not sure why it does not work when using the object itself and had to make a copy. 

As we know, when every Gi is normal in G, then the series is called a normal series:

cs := CompositionSeries(DihedralGroup(8))

We can draw it:

DrawSubgroupLattice(DihedralGroup(8), labels = ids, highlight = cs)

And all Gi is normal in G:

IsNormal~(cs, DihedralGroup(8))

[true, true, true, true, true]

But why type(cs, 'NormalSeries') will get false.. It is a bug or do I have a misunderstanding?

I am still struggling understanding Maple Object  inheritance due to lack of good examples and sparse documenation.

This is what I am trying to do. I have base class Person, and then make Employee class which extends Person class and adds new field.   

The constructor to the Employee class then needs to call the constructor to the Person class (its base class) in order to initialize it. The base class constuctor takes care of initialization the fields in the base class.

I do not know how to do this. Actually it is not clear to me how the proto argument gets into play in all of this. I could not find one example that explains how to use proto with inheritance.

I am trying to implement this python example. I will show the code for the Python, and my Maple translation. The part I do not know how to do, it how to call the constructor for the base class from the sub class.  If I do not do this, then the fields of the base class will remain unitilized.

Python example is from https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/python-access-parent-class-attribute/

# parent class 
class Person( object ):     
    
        # __init__ is known as the constructor          
        def __init__(self, name, idnumber):    
                self.name = name 
                self.idnumber = idnumber 
                  
        def display(self): 
                print(self.name) 
                print(self.idnumber) 
    
# child class 
class Employee( Person ):            
        def __init__(self, name, idnumber, salary): 
                self.salary = salary 
    
                # invoking the constructor of the parent class  
                #----->>>>> HOW TO DO THIS IN MAPLE?
                Person.__init__(self, name, idnumber)  
          
        def show(self):
            print(self.salary)

# creation of an object
# variable or an instance 
a = Employee('Rahul', 886012, 30000000)     
    
# calling a function of the
# class Person using Employee's
# class instance 
a.display()
a.show() 

Here is the Maple code

restart;
person:=module() 
    option object; 
    #I made these exported instead of local for ease of printing from outside while
    #debugging , that is all.. These should otherwise be local

    export idnumber::integer:=0;  
    export name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto, name::string, idnumber::integer, $) 
        _self:-idnumber := idnumber;
        _self:-name := name;
    end proc;
 
end module; 
#---- extend the above class 

employee:=module() 
    option object(person); 
    export salary::integer:=0;  

    ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto, name::string, idnumber::integer, salary::integer , $) 
        _self:-salary := salary;
        # invoking the constructor of the parent class  
        # How to do that in Maple?

        #I could always manually do this. But I do not want to duplicate the code
        #done by the base class constructor.
        #_self:-name := name;
        #_self:-idnumber := idnumber;
        
    end proc;
 
end module; 

 

How does one do the Python example in Maple?

Someone should write a book on programming using OOP in Maple. I'll buy a copy in advance.

Maple 2022.1

I need to make my base class local variable static, so that when extending the class, the subclass will share these variable and use their current values as set by the base class. If I do not make them static, then the base class when extended, will get fresh instance of these variable, losing their original values, which is not what I want.

To do this, one must make the base class variables static

This works, but now I do not know the syntax where to put the type on the variable. 

I can't write   local m::integer::static; nor local m::static::integer;

I could only write local m::static; but this means I lost the ability to have a type on the variable and lost some of the type checking which is nice to have in Maple. From Maple help:

 

Here is example

restart;

base_class:=module()
  option object;
  local n::static;  #I want this type to ::integer also. But do not know how

  export set_n::static:=proc(_self,n::integer,$)
     _self:-n := n;
  end proc;
  
  export process::static:=proc(_self,$)
    local o;
    o:=Object(sub_class);
    o:-process();
  end proc;
end module;    

sub_class:=module()
   option object(base_class);
   process:=proc(_self,$)
      print("in sub class. _self:-n = ",_self:-n);
   end proc;
end module;

o:=Object(base_class);
o:-set_n(10);
o:-process()


            "in sub class. _self:-n = ", 10

The above is all working OK. I just would like to make n in the base class of type ::integer as well as ::static

Is there a syntax for doing this?

 

The suggested solution in the answer https://mapleprimes.com/questions/234325-Use-Of-self--Inside-Object-Constructor  worked OK in the setup shown in that question.

But it does not work when putting the constructor inside overload

Here is an example where it works (i.e. by removing the type from _self as suggested in the above answer)

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    #notice no _self::person, just _self
    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ )            
           name:= the_name;
    end proc;

end module;


p:=Object(person,"me")

The above works. But since I have different constructors, once I put the above inside overload, using the same exact syntax, now the error comes back

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    export ModuleCopy::static:= overload( 
    [
       proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ ) option overload;           
           name:= the_name;
      end proc
    ]);

end module;
             

p:=Object(person,"me")

Error, static procedure `ModuleCopy` refers to non-static local or export `name::string` in surrounding scope

I did not expect that using overload will cause any change to how it behaves. Is this a bug?

Below is worksheet also.

interface(version);

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2022.1, Windows 10, May 26 2022 Build ID 1619613`

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ )            
           name:= the_name;
    end proc;

end module;

_m2950059551392

p:=Object(person,"me")

_m2950172920000

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    export ModuleCopy::static:= overload(
    [
       proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ ) option overload;           
           name:= the_name;
      end proc
    ]);

end module;

_m2950059551392

p:=Object(person,"me")

Error, static procedure `ModuleCopy` refers to non-static local or export `name::string` in surrounding scope

 

Download OO_version.mw

First 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Page 31 of 35