Greetings everyone. I tried to get the roots of this polynomial by using allvalues command. But I got the roots in indeces instead of the value of the roots.

what should i do?

How to identify whether biased game is changed based on the latest toss from a sequence

can HMM identify this?

for example

if

fair fair fair biased biased fair fair biased

When greek symbols are used in code edit region (by copying from worksheet 2d math mode), they used to get exported properly to PDF but the only issue was large code edit region used to get cut off. But now with this new 18.01 update, code edit region is not cut off but greek symbol inside code edit region are not appearing in PDF export instead just pink boxes. Has anyone else also encountered this issue and suggest a resolution.

how i can trust in DirectSearch solution result.is there any creteria?

my variable is intensity.

this is my code:

ep0 := 1/(4*3.14); el := 8.54*10^(-2); hbar := 1; vf := 1/300; kb := 1; tem := 2.586*10^(-2); ci := 1; p := 1.458*10^16; beta := 2; ai := 7.1*10^(-4); bi := ai/sqrt(3); enph := .196; d := enph/(kb*tem); n0 := 1/(exp(enph/(kb*tem))-1); gama := hbar*vf; intensity := 10000001; w := 1.55; impurity := 7.2*10^3;

g := hbar*beta/(bi^2*sqrt(2*p*enph)); aa := g^2*(n0+1)/(2*Pi*hbar*gama^2); bb := g^2*n0/(2*Pi*hbar*gama^2); cc := 2/(Pi*gama^2); l := (1*hbar)*w/(2*kb*tem);u := el^2*intensity/(32*w*hbar^2);

DirectSearch:-SolveEquations([op([((enph*ln(1+exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))/(kb*tem)-polylog(2, -exp(c))+polylog(2, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem))))*enph*(kb*tem)^2-(enph^2*ln(1+exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))/(kb^2*tem^2)+2*enph*polylog(2, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))/(kb*tem)+2*polylog(3, -exp(c))-2*polylog(3, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem))))*(kb*tem)^3+(-exp(b)*enph*ln(1+exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))+exp(c+d)*enph*ln(1+exp(b-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+exp(b)*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(c))-exp(c+d)*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(b-d))-exp(b)*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))+exp(c+d)*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(b-d+enph/(kb*tem))))*enph*(kb*tem)^2/((exp(b)-exp(c+d))*kb*tem)+(exp(b)*enph^2*ln(1+exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))-exp(c+d)*enph^2*ln(1+exp(b-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(b)*enph*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))-2*exp(c+d)*enph*kb*tem*polylog(2, -exp(b-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(b)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(3, -exp(c))-2*exp(c+d)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(3, -exp(b-d))-2*exp(b)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(3, -exp(c+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(c+d)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(3, -exp(b-d+enph/(kb*tem))))*(kb*tem)^3/((exp(b)-exp(c+d))*kb^2*tem^2))*bb+u*(1/(1+exp(-l-c))-1/((1+exp(-l-c))*(1+exp(l-b))))-(((1*enph)*(enph-2*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem))))/(2*kb^2*tem^2)+2*kb^2*tem^2*(-polylog(2, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+polylog(2, -cosh(b)+sinh(b))))*enph*(kb*tem)^2-(enph^2*(enph-3*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem))))-6*kb^2*tem^2*(enph*polylog(2, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+kb*tem*(-polylog(3, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+polylog(3, -cosh(b)+sinh(b)))))*(kb*tem)^3/(3*kb^3*tem^3)-(-exp(b)*enph^2+exp(c+d)*enph^2-2*exp(c+d)*enph*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(b)*enph*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-c-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(c+d)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-b))-2*exp(b)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-c-d))-2*exp(c+d)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+2*exp(b)*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-c-d+enph/(kb*tem))))*enph*(kb*tem)^2/((2*(-exp(b)+exp(c+d)))*kb^2*tem^2)-(exp(b)*enph^3-exp(c+d)*enph^3+3*exp(c+d)*enph^2*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))-3*exp(b)*enph^2*kb*tem*ln(1+exp(-c-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+6*exp(c+d)*enph*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))-6*exp(b)*enph*kb^2*tem^2*polylog(2, -exp(-c-d+enph/(kb*tem)))+6*exp(c+d)*kb^3*tem^3*polylog(3, -exp(-b))-6*exp(b)*kb^3*tem^3*polylog(3, -exp(-c-d))-6*exp(c+d)*kb^3*tem^3*polylog(3, -exp(-b+enph/(kb*tem)))+6*exp(b)*kb^3*tem^3*polylog(3, -exp(-c-d+enph/(kb*tem))))*(kb*tem)^3/((3*(-exp(b)+exp(c+d)))*kb^3*tem^3))*aa-u*(1/(1+exp(l-b))-1/((1+exp(-l-c))*(1+exp(l-b)))) = 0, -cc*polylog(2, -exp(b))+cc*polylog(2, -exp(-c))-impurity = 0])], tolerances = 10^(-8), evaluationlimit = 20000)

Is it within the Physics environment possible to specify two sets, A and B, say, of quantities for which the following holds?

1.) any two elements of A anticommute,

2.) any two elements of B anticommute (as well), but

3.) any quantity from A commutes (not anticommutes) with any quantity from B.

Hello,
I have a system of first order diff. equations which I would like to solve symbolically. Unfortunately, Maple does not solve the system. Do anybody have suggestions how can I solve this system (please see below):

diff(S(t), t) = -eta*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))*K(t)*S(t)/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))),

diff(K(t), t) = S(t)*((z*eta*alpha*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))*S(t)-upsilon*(eta*alpha^2*Q(t)^2-2*C[max]*w*N*eta*alpha*Q(t)+((-N*w+z)*alpha+N*C[max]^2*w*eta)*N*w))*K(t)^2+(2*((1/2)*z*eta*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))*S(t)+N*w*upsilon*(N*w-z)))*S(t)*alpha*K(t)+N*S(t)^2*w*alpha*upsilon*(N*w-z))/((K(t)^2*alpha*z+3*S(t)*K(t)*alpha*z+S(t)*(2*S(t)*z*alpha+upsilon*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))))*(S(t)+K(t))*N*w),

diff(Q(t), t) = (-alpha*z*(z*eta*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))*K(t)+N*w*upsilon*(N*w-z))*S(t)^2+(-z^2*eta*alpha*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t))*K(t)^2-(eta*alpha^2*Q(t)^2-2*C[max]*w*N*eta*alpha*Q(t)+N*w*((2*N*w-2*z)*alpha+N*C[max]^2*w*eta))*z*upsilon*K(t)-N*w*upsilon^2*(N*w-z)*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t)))*S(t)-N*w*z*alpha*upsilon*K(t)^2*(N*w-z))/((2*S(t)^2*alpha*z+(3*z*alpha*K(t)+upsilon*(C[max]*w*N-alpha*Q(t)))*S(t)+K(t)^2*alpha*z)*N*w*upsilon)

where initials conditions are:

S(0) = S0, K(0) = K0, Q(0) = Q0

Thanks,

Dmitry

Hi Everybody,

I installed the Maple Toolbox for matlab and tried to run my old code.  For some reason, maple('restart') will cause Matlab to lock up.  Any ideas?

Windows 7 64-bit.  Matlab 2012b 32-bit, Maple 18 32-bit

Hi Mapleprimers,

I'm using CodeGeneration to convert a procedure I obtained with unapply() into a Matlab function.  I'm having problems getting the outputting function to run correctly in Matlab.  I'm going to dynamically generating equations, so directly editing the Matlab code won't work here.  I'm having problems getting any output in Matlab.  Here is the code I'm working on:  Series_addGear_codegen.mw

Ideally I would like output in a matrix.  I've tried putting the unapplied procedure in another procedure, but the CodeGeneration doesn't work.

This is the maple output from the function:

unapp(1,2,3,4,5);
{BAT_A = -2.267032891, BAT_V = 271, EM2_A = .4615464218, EM2_P = 125.0790803, EM2_T = -1, EM2_V = 271, EM2_W = 2, GBa_T = 12, GBa_W = 5/3, GBb_T = -4, GBb_W = 5, GEN_A = 1.805486469, GEN_P = 489.2868330, GEN_T = -12, GEN_V = 271, GEN_W = 5/3, ICE_mdot_g = 20}

Since I'll know the order of variables, I want the Matlab function to output:

[-2.267032891,  271,  .4615464218,  125.0790803,  -1, ...]

This is the output after putting the Matlab function in Matlab:

>> unapp(1, 1, 1, 1, 1)
Undefined function or variable 'BAT_A'.

Error in unapp (line 39)
unappreturn = unique([BAT_A == -t35 / 0.271e3 - t73 / 0.271e3 BAT_V == 271 EM2_A == t35 /
0.271e3 EM2_P == t35 EM2_T == -FD_T EM2_V == 271 EM2_W == FD_W GBa_T == t44 GBa_W == t41 GBb_T
== -ICE_T GB

This is the Matlab code that is generated by Maple 18:

MCode:=CodeGeneration[Matlab](unapp, declare = [FD_T::float, FD_W::float, GB_R::float, ICE_T::float, ICE_W::float],defaulttype=float,optimize,defaulttype = numeric);
Warning, could not preprocess. Found `abs` or similar in the 'While'/'For' conditions.
Warning, procedure/module options ignored
function unappreturn = unapp(FD_T, FD_W, GB_R, ICE_T, ICE_W)
t2 = 0.1e1 * FD_T * FD_W;
t5 = abs(FD_W);
t7 = abs(FD_T);
t9 = t5 ^ 2;
t13 = t7 ^ 2;
t15 = t9 * t5;
t21 = t13 * t7;
t23 = t9 ^ 2;
t31 = t13 ^ 2;
t33 = 0.1483000000e3 - 0.4267000000e1 * t5 - 0.1277000000e2 * t7 + 0.3640000000e-1 * t9 - 0.1160000000e1 * t5 * t7 + 0.2580000000e0 * t13 - 0.1181000000e-3 * t15 + 0.5994000000e-3 * t9 * t7 - 0.1171000000e-3 * t5 * t13 - 0.1739000000e-2 * t21 + 0.1245000000e-6 * t23 - 0.1200000000e-5 * t15 * t7 + 0.1584000000e-5 * t9 * t13 - 0.4383000000e-6 * t5 * t21 + 0.2947000000e-5 * t31;
if (-t2 == 0.0e0)
t35 = 0.0e0;
elseif (-t2 < 0.0e0)
t35 = t33;
else
t35 = -t33;
end
t36 = ICE_T * ICE_W;
t37 = 0.1e1 * t36;
t41 = ICE_W / GB_R;
t42 = abs(t41);
t44 = ICE_T * GB_R;
t45 = abs(t44);
t47 = t42 ^ 2;
t51 = t45 ^ 2;
t53 = t47 * t42;
t59 = t51 * t45;
t61 = t47 ^ 2;
t69 = t51 ^ 2;
t71 = 0.5280000000e-11 - 0.3849000000e-13 * t42 + 0.7190000000e2 * t45 + 0.1168000000e-15 * t47 - 0.1296000000e1 * t42 * t45 - 0.2489000000e1 * t51 - 0.1451000000e-18 * t53 - 0.1326000000e-3 * t47 * t45 + 0.8141000000e-2 * t42 * t51 + 0.4539000000e-2 * t59 + 0.6325000000e-22 * t61 + 0.2091000000e-6 * t53 * t45 - 0.3455000000e-5 * t47 * t51 - 0.2499000000e-4 * t42 * t59 + 0.5321000000e-4 * t69;
if (-t37 == 0.0e0)
t73 = 0.0e0;
elseif (-t37 < 0.0e0)
t73 = t71;
else
t73 = -t71;
end
unappreturn = unique([BAT_A == -t35 / 0.271e3 - t73 / 0.271e3 BAT_V == 271 EM2_A == t35 / 0.271e3 EM2_P == t35 EM2_T == -FD_T EM2_V == 271 EM2_W == FD_W GBa_T == t44 GBa_W == t41 GBb_T == -ICE_T GBb_W == ICE_W GEN_A == t73 / 0.271e3 GEN_P == t73 GEN_T == -t44 GEN_V == 271 GEN_W == t41 ICE_mdot_g == t36]);

I am not able to simplify my equation, any help would be appreciated ! I want the  term to be eliminated

Download 1.mw

hello evreybody i have these Error :

restart:with(plots):
M:=765 : m:=587 :I:=76.3*10^3 :Jp:=7.3*10^3 :e:=10.92: F:=0.42: omega:=0.56 :ka:=0.1:kb:=0.1:kc:=0.1: lambda1:=0.1 :lambda2:=0.1:lambda3:=0.1:
Error, illegal use of an object as a name

please help 
thank you !

Hi All. Hope all is well.

Assume that we have partitioned [0,a], into N equidistant subintervals and in each subinterval we have M sets of polynomials of arbitrary form[say b_ij(t)](a.e Taylor series, or Bernstein series,…)

for Example with N=4, M=3 and by Taylor series we have:

now we want to approximate a function, asy f(t), in this interval with following form:

If we have:

(Tau is a constant number)
then: How can  we find L and Z matrices using maple? Is it any way? (or other softwares?)

Regards

Mahmood   Dadkhah

Ph.D Candidate

Applied Mathematics Department

I was given that solitary initial state to see how it will deform as time goes on. am struggling to get my code so that I can get video frames. please help on how I can generate my code

u_o(x)= a₀x²(1-x)² for x (less than or equal to) x (less than or equal) 1

u₀(x)    = 0 for x > 1

the video clips will be representing the function u(*,t) :x to u(x,t)

for a sequence of choices of t such as t=0; t=0,5...t=3

 “Error, too many levels of recursion” ,but there’s just a single expression.

How can this happen?

The help documents read，

“

 The function unames returns an expression sequence consisting of all the active names in the current Maple session which are ``unassigned names''.

“

But what unames() returns is obviously not the contents one expects:

Hello,

It is not a very important question... but i like when i have a nice worksheet.

I would like to change the color of the maple input. Unfortunately, i manage to change the color for the inputs already created but not for the new maple input.

How can i change the color for the new maple input i want to create ?

Thank you for your help.