In previous versions of Maple there was an abort/interrupt capability-one could hold down the command key and a period at the same time and eventually Maple would stop the calculation. (Mac worksheet interface). Now there is an interrupt icon which is frequently ignored by Maple. I am currently in an ∞ loop and cannot get out! Help!

hi let's look for the intersection of 2 functions the first one f1 := unapply(CurveFitting[Spline]([[1.55, 1], [1.6, 0], [1.65, 0], [1.7, 0], [1.75, 0], [1.80, 0], [1.85, 0], [1.9, 0], [1.95, 0]], x, degree = 1), x); the second one r := unapply(CurveFitting[Spline]([[1.55, 0], [1.6, 1], [1.65, 1], [1.7, 1], [1.75, 0], [1.80, 0], [1.85, 0], [1.9, 0], [1.95, 0]], x, degree = 1), x); when we plot the 2 functions : plot({f1(x), r(x)}, x = 1 .. 1.95, y = 0 .. 1, thickness = 3); we see that there is 2 intersections that are 1.575000000, RealRange(1.750000000, infinity) but maple gives 1.575000000, 1.550000000, RealRange(1.750000000, infinity)

I have conmpleted a maplet application. It takes 45 seconds to initiate the application. I understand to speed up my application is to convert it into a module. Can someone show me how to convert my applicatioh into module. Consider the application: with(Maplets[Elements]):Hello:=Maplet(["Hello World!", Button("OK", Shutdown())]): Maplets[Display](Hello): thanks in advance. Pat

Hi guys, i wrote this fairly simply routine, to basically generate n equations, generate relations between those equations, then attempt to solve them by comparing coeffients, upon which i group together the information about the coefficients, for example i could have the equation ax+by=4x, so from that x=4,b=0 The equations in question are Dx=[x,Dy]+[Dx,y], when D is a map which maps x and y to A, where x and y span A's basis. so Dx and Dy would be a linear combination of x and y. This would be for the 2 dimensional case, for the n dimensional case x and y would extend to n variables.

I am looking for some lecture notes covering 'the' 'elementary' properties of the Laplace transform, preferable (but not already written) using Maple for the proofs. What I would like to see is L(f, s) = Int(f(t)*exp(-t*s),t = 0 .. infinity) where s may be _complex_ and is not assumed to be real.

Hi, I noticed that in the lastest version of TexMacs 1.0.6.5 that maple is supported. I downloaded it. It appears to run OK, but I can't get the maple mode to load. It shows up in the session selection. I would appreciate any help or pointers. My system: Win XP fully updated and patch, Maple 10 or Maple 7 or Maple V.5. Thanks Ralph Wallace K9RWW@ARRL.NET

Hi! I'm searching for a useful guide of the MapletBuilder (for Maple 11). I know how to create Boxes 'n' Stuff. Now I want to assign commands to the buttons,which should be executed by pushing them but I don't know how to do that. By that I mean where to put them and what kind of commands exist or do I have to use. I need a guide with some examples. It would be great if anyone could help me. Thanks paience

Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to use Document Components or Maplet Elements from Java? Is there a file that has the library for these components? I use the Netbeans environment, has anyone set up that environment to use Maple libraries? Thanks, Art

I have get a functionsystem:

I am solving a constrained maximization problem using the Lagrangian and getting back an empty set of solutions, i.e.: solns_LSW:= How do I go about diagnosing why Maple is having difficulty finding solutions? (Once I know that, I would of course also like to know how, if possible, to change the set-up so that Maple might actually find the solution(s)!) I can see that the Lagrangian becomes non-concave for cases where lambda2>p (p is one of the variables I am solving for: there are two, s and p -- see attached worksheet). This would clearly be the case for, say, p=0 optimal (which I have reason to believe it is, based on some numerical simulations I ran).

Suppose I've plotted 3 functions:

Now I'd like to have these 3 plots following one after another (in a successive manner) in 1 plot like diagram. How can I perform such a task?

 

Another question:

How can I have a plot in reverse range? For example instead of plot(x^2,x=0..1), I'd like to have sth as plot(x^2,x=1..0), i.e. the horizontal range begins from 1 and ends to zero (also the vertical range is from (1)^2=1 to (0)^2=0).

I am trying to export a worksheet from Maple11 to LaTeX using the "export as" function. It produces a .tex-file that uses the "maplestd2e"-package. When I compile the document I see the output of the computations and all figures, but I don't see the maple-commands that I have entered to obtain the output. It works fine if I use Classic Worksheet mode, which uses the "maple2e"-package. Any suggestions on how I can export the Maple input commands to LaTeX using the standard Maple11? Thank you. mami

Hi, I've been using maple10 worksheets under os x, setting the default zoom to 75%. This is fine. However, I've recently migrated to a linux system. Now, if I display a matrix under maple10 (or maple11) with 75% zoom, all of the spaces around the entries of the matrix are lost! This makes for unreadable 2d output. This is also true under 50% zoom (which is already unreadable) and if I change the default zoom in my .maple10rc file to _anything_ less than 100%, the same loss of spacing results. Does anyone else find this to be a problem. Sure, I can work with 100% zoom, but if there's a s

To Maplet Experts: I am about to complete my maplet application developed in my desktop with screen resolution of 1440 by 900 pixels. My window layout has the following dimensions: width=850 and height=675. I am pleased with the layout of my application when shown in my desktop. I move my code to my laptop with screen resolutions of 1200 by 800 pixels. The layout of my application in my laptop is distorted and ugly even though I adjust the window layout using proportions. Is there a trick or rule of thumb I can follow when transfering an application from desktop to laptop. Thanks in advance

Hi folks! Does anybody know if Matlab and Maple and Mathematica works well and stable on Vista? How about speed on Vista? Thanks!