restart;
with(LinearAlgebra):
with(GraphTheory):

with(ListTools);
with(MTM);

g:=Graph(Matrix([[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]]));

Eg := sum(evalf(abs(Eigenvalues(AdjacencyMatrix(g)))));
print(Eg);

DEg := sum(evalf(abs(Eigenvalues(AllPairsDistance(g)))));

print(DEg);

The evalf is taking too much it is running infinetly

Now for such matricies what to do 

Python can run it fast but i require it in maplesoft only 
Kind help if someone can help they will be acknowledged.

Hi friends, I have a problem. From a given number 'k' I want to generate a string 's' with the first naturals before the number k. Like this:

k := 5;

s := "01234";

I want to use the above in the following command:

(parse~@Vector[row]@StringTools:-Explode)~(StringTools:-Generate(k,s));

Thank you.

Hi friends, I have a set of polynomials, 'a', and I want to calculate the product of all possible combinations by taking 3 elements at a time. Like this:

a := {x+1,x+2,x^2+1,x^2+x+2}
a[1]*a[2]*a[3]
a[1]*a[2]*a[4]
a[1]*a[3]*a[4]
a[2]*a[3]*a[4]

I have a larger 'a' set so I was looking for a simple method to perform these operations.
Thank you.

I am happy to announce that registration for Maple Conference 2021, to be held Nov. 2-5, is now open! The event is once again virtual and free this year. On our home page, you can find information about our keynote presentations. Our keynote speakers this year are Dr. Veselin Jungic, Dr. Evelyne Hubert and Dr. Laurent Bernardin.

The Agenda & Event Format page contains preliminary information about the event and will be updated as the agenda develops. This page describes two add-on workshops that are also free of charge: "Maple Programming: Beyond the Basics" and "Advanced Problem Solving with Regular Chains".

You can register for both the conference and the add-on workshops here: Maple Conference 2021. I hope to see you all in November!

Hi,

I have a function of 3 variables (PiM) which I can use in plot3d given the first argument while the other two arguments are functions of the two variables I use in plot3d.

In the code I attached below, I am plotting 2 planes using plot3d, but I cannot implicitplot where these two planes intersect. COuld you please take a look at my code?

Thanks.

maple_primes_question.mw

Hi
I have a huge trigonometric expression in Maple with an approximate length of length(.)=397593353.

When I compute this expression in Matlab, I receive another expression with a much smaller length, and the reason is that Matlab is using subexpressions to calculate the main expression. However, I need to do this in Maple.

I have already tried to simplify, but it didn't work.
The maple worksheet & a screenshot of the Matlab subexpression is attached.

See below file for expression in maple (Please run the "Main.mpl" in the attached file.):

Ldiff.zip

And part of the expression in Matlab is shown in the below picture

Where the subexpressions (again in Matlab) are shown below:

Let a,b,c,d and E be constants.

Prove that Laplace{at^-c+bt^-d} = E{as^-c+bs^-d}

if and only if c+d=1 and E= +or-  sqr(pi*csc(c*pi))

Given the property of Gamma:

Gamma(p)Gamma(1-p)=pi/(sin(p*pi)), 0<p<1

This is from an old Schaums outline on Laplace Transforms.

By hand i get  E{as^-d+bs^-c}.

Cant figure out how to get Maple to express this.

Greeting to all of you, I'm having problem in searching for R in this silmutaneious equation. How do I solve this?

Please help me to solve the system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations with the help of the Homotopy perturbation method in MAPLE. I have attached a worksheet please check.  Please please help me.

Thank you

HELP.mw

Hi,

Is there a way to change the font type and size when printing a table of data using DocumentTools:-Tabulate? Also can I change the column width?

DocTabFont.mw

I have calculated z=f(x,y) for x from 0 to 5 and y from 0 to 5 by taking step size 0.5  and stored it in a matrix M. Now I am trying to plot the resultant matrix having order 11x11. Where x and y values are ranging from 0 to 5. But If I use this command
matrixplot(M, heights = histogram, colorscheme = ["Blue", "Green", "Yellow", "Red"])
It is taking 0 to 11 on both x and y axis. It must be 0,0.5,0.1,0.15...5.
How to change the values of x and y axis manually?

hi! how can I write it correct?

this is the parametric curve in cartesian coordinates:

spacecurve([2*t^3 - 2*t, 4*t^2, t^3 + t], t = -1 .. 1, color = black, numpoints = 1000, orientation = [90, 90, 90]);

and this should be the same curve but in spherical coordinates:

spacecurve([sqrt(5)*(t^3 + t), arccos(1/sqrt(5)), arccot((t^2 - 1)/(2*t))], t = -1 .. 1, coords = spherical, color = black);

I rewrite that parametrization using formula from this page 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system

why doesn't it work?

help on structured type says

| identical(expr) an expression identical to expr

and

The type identical(expr) matches the expression expr identically. If there is more than one expr (i.e. identical(expr1,expr2,...)), then this type matches any one of the exprN identically.
 

Then why does the following produce the same output?

restart;
expr:=x*A[2]+A[1];
select(type,expr,'`*`'({anything, identical(x^2)}));
select(type,expr,'`*`'({anything, identical(x)}))

x*A[2]

x*A[2]

I would have expected only the second select to find x*A[2].

What do I need to only select anything*x^2 without selecting anything*x ?

Actually anything in identical gives same result

select(type,expr,'`*`'({anything, identical(zzzzz)}));

x*A[2]

So I must be misunderstanding something about identical and how it works.  I want to match only anything*x^2 and nothing else. How to do that?

all these things are trivial to do use pattern matching. But in Maple, one is supposed to use structured types.

I can't figure this one out.

I need to pick out the subexpression   anything*sin(3*x) from an expression.

it works, when the expression is   anything*sin(3*x)+something else. But when the expression is exactly  anything*sin(3*x) then select returns 1 and not anything*sin(3*x) as I was expecting.

So I must be doing something silly, but do not see it.

restart;
TypeTools:-AddType('type_1', '`*`'({anything,identical(exp(3*x))}));
expr:=25*A[1]*exp(3*x);
type(expr,type_1);

returns true. good. Now I test it on 

select(type,expr+sin(x),type_1) ;

and this returns what is expected. 25*A[1]*exp(3*x) but when I type

select(type,expr,type_1) ;

it return 1 

reading select help page did not help.  Tried flatten, inplace.

I can do this using patmatch

patmatch(expr,a::anything*exp(3*x),'la');la

But why is select not working in the above? What is the correct way to do this so it works for a*expr+anything and also for a*expr only? This is done inside a function and not interactive. So I need it to work for both cases, since the input can be anything, but I only need the term anything*exp(3*x) pulled out.

Hi,

As I am continuing to use Maple, I find I use multiple customized worksheets and documents as well as a maple student guide or AEM guide.......How can I save the workspace with these other documents so that I don't have to rebuild them everytime I use that customized Maple system?

Thanks for your help!

Frank