Advanced Search

Maple Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple
View unanswered posts
Maple Questions and Posts Feed

Why the output of an expression using indexed name...

Asked by: ianmccr 165
output
July 28 2019
2  5

    I have encountered a peculiar behavior in Maple 2019 worksheets. I have attached a worksheet which illustrates a reversal of the coefficient and the blade in the following types of expression.  My Maple installation is set in options to use maple input and output (1D notation).  I am using build ID 1399874.

The procedure I was testing used the add function to expand a multivector over basis blades and coefficients represented by indexed names; for example
    add(a[indx[]]*e[indx[]], indx = indxes); where indxes:={[1],[2],[3],[1,2],[1,3],[1,4],[2,3],[2,4]};

The expected result
a[1]*e[1]+a[2]*e[2]+a[3]*e[3]+a[4]*e[1, 2]+a[5]*e[1, 3]+a[6]*e[1, 4]+a[7]*e[2, 3]+a[8]*e[2, 4] in 1D notation but instead I got

e[1]*xx[1]+e[2]*xx[2]+e[3]*xx[3]+e[1, 2]*xx[4]+e[1, 3]*xx[5]+e[1, 4]*xx[6]+ e[2, 3]*xx[7]+e[2, 4]*xx[8]

(Note and the different coefficient names illustrates the exchange is caused by sorting.)

Initially, I assumed that this resulted from the add command, but after I directly entered an indexed expression into the worksheet and obtained a similar result I realized it must be occurring during the output.  Apparently, before the expression is written, it is first sorted. I know this because, if the coefficient is named a,b,c,d ( less than e), the expression is not exchanged. In addition, if I convert the expression to 2D output, the expression is written in the normal order specified in the add command.

I also confirmed this behavior in Maple 2018.2 as well.  Hopefully, the example worksheet attached will illustrate this behavior.  Am I correct in assuming that when the code I am using in the worksheet with is incorporated into a module in an mpl file and loaded, this will not be an issue.

exchangeproblem.mw

How I can solve eigenvalue problem...

Asked by: 9009134 110
eigenvalues determinant
July 28 2019
0  2

Hello,

How I can extract coefficients from and by calculating determinant for Eigenvalue problem, the value of omega.

For more details please see attached PDF file.

Thanks so much.

eign.pdf

 

running in multiprocessor...

Asked by: radaar 202
performance parallelization duplicate-question
July 28 2019
0  12

How to run the following calculation in multiple processor

 

ADD.mw

view matrix as 2-d image instead of 1-d text...

Asked by: WmEllis 15
matrix output
July 28 2019
3  6

In Maply 2018, inputting (entering in red text)

A := <<1,2,3>|<6,7,8>>;

produces output (in blue text)

A := Matrix(3, 2, {(1, 1) = 1, (1, 2) = 6, (2, 1) = 2, (2, 2) = 7, (3, 1) = 3, (3, 2) = 8}, datatype = anything, storage = rectangular, order = Fortran_order, shape = [])

What must I do to make the output appear appear instead as a standard 2-d array, with big brackets to the left and right, 1st column = <1,2,3>; 2nd column = <6,7,8>?

Thank you.

 

Unexpected solution to PDE...

Asked by: Rouben Rostamian 7711
pde differential-equations elliptic
July 28 2019
3  2

We solve Laplace's equation in the domain a < r and r < b, c < t and t < d
in polar coordinates subject to prescribed Dirichlet data.

Maple produces a solution in the form of an infinite sum,
but that solution fails to satisfy the boundary condition
on the domain's outer arc.  Is this a bug or am I missing
something?

> 

restart;
> 

kernelopts(version);

`Maple 2019.1, X86 64 LINUX, May 21 2019, Build ID 1399874`

> 

with(plots):
> 

pde := diff(u(r,t),r,r) + diff(u(r,t),r)/r + diff(u(r,t),t,t)/r^2 = 0;

diff(diff(u(r, t), r), r)+(diff(u(r, t), r))/r+(diff(diff(u(r, t), t), t))/r^2 = 0

> 

a, b, c, d := 1, 2, Pi/6, Pi/2;

1, 2, (1/6)*Pi, (1/2)*Pi

> 

bc := u(r,c)=c, u(r,d)=0, u(a,t)=0, u(b,t)=t;

u(r, (1/6)*Pi) = (1/6)*Pi, u(r, (1/2)*Pi) = 0, u(1, t) = 0, u(2, t) = t

We plot the boundary data on the domain's outer arc:

> 

p1 := plots:-spacecurve([b*cos(t), b*sin(t), t], t=c..d, color=red, thickness=5);

Solve the PDE:

> 

pdsol := pdsolve({pde, bc});

u(r, t) = Sum((1/6)*cos(3*signum(n1-1/4)*(-1+4*n1)*t)*(2*Pi*sin((1/2)*signum(n1-1/4)*Pi)*abs(n1-1/4)-6*Pi*sin((3/2)*signum(n1-1/4)*Pi)*abs(n1-1/4)+cos((3/2)*signum(n1-1/4)*Pi)-cos((1/2)*signum(n1-1/4)*Pi))*signum(n1-1/4)*8^(signum(n1-1/4)*(4*n1+1))*(r^((-3+12*n1)*signum(n1-1/4))-r^((3-12*n1)*signum(n1-1/4)))/(abs(n1-1/4)*Pi*(-1+4*n1)*(16777216^(signum(n1-1/4)*n1)-64^signum(n1-1/4))), n1 = 0 .. infinity)+Sum(-(1/3)*((-1)^n-1)*sin(n*Pi*ln(r)/ln(2))*(exp((1/6)*Pi*n*(Pi+6*t)/ln(2))-exp((1/6)*Pi*n*(7*Pi-6*t)/ln(2)))/(n*(exp((1/3)*n*Pi^2/ln(2))-exp(n*Pi^2/ln(2)))), n = 1 .. infinity)

Truncate the infinite sum at 20 terms, and plot the result:

> 

eval(rhs(pdsol), infinity=20):
value(%):
p2 := plot3d([r*cos(t), r*sin(t), %], r=a..b, t=c..d);

Here is the combined plot of the solution and the boundary condition.
We see that the proposed solution completely misses the boundary condition.

> 

plots:-display([p1,p2], orientation=[25,72,0]);


 

Download mw.mw

Numbrix Puzzle by the branch and bound method

by: Kitonum 20084 Maple 2018
branchandbound numbrix-puzzle
July 28 2019
3  3

In this post, the Numbrix Puzzle is solved by the branch and bound method (see the details of this puzzle in  https://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/210643-Solving-A-Numbrix-Puzzle-With-Logic). The main difference from the solution using the  Logic  package is that here we get not one but all possible solutions. In the case of a unique solution, the  NumbrixPuzzle procedure is faster than the  Numbrix  one (for convenience, I inserted the code for Numbrix procedure into the worksheet below). In the case of many solutions, the  Numbrix  procedure is usually faster (see all the examples below).

 

> 

restart;
> 

NumbrixPuzzle:=proc(A::Matrix)
local A1, L, N, S, MS, OneStepLeft, OneStepRight, F1, F2, m, L1, p, q, a, b, T, k, s1, s, H, n, L2, i, j, i1, j1, R;
uses ListTools;
S:=upperbound(A); N:=nops(op(A)[3]); MS:=`*`(S);
A1:=convert(A, listlist);
for i from 1 to S[1] do
for j from 1 to S[2] do
for i1 from i to S[1] do
for j1 from 1 to S[2] do
if A1[i,j]<>0 and A1[i1,j1]<>0 and abs(A1[i,j]-A1[i1,j1])<abs(i-i1)+abs(j-j1) then return `no solutions` fi;
od; od; od; od;
L:=sort(select(e->e<>0, Flatten(A1)));
L1:=[`if`(L[1]>1,seq(L[1]-k, k=0..L[1]-2),NULL)];
L2:=[seq(seq(`if`(L[i+1]-L[i]>1,L[i]+k,NULL),k=0..L[i+1]-L[i]-2), i=1..nops(L)-1), `if`(L[-1]<MS,seq(L[-1]+k,k=0..MS-L[-1]-1),NULL)];
  

OneStepLeft:=proc(A1::listlist)
local s, M, m, k, T;
uses ListTools;
s:=Search(a, Matrix(A1));   
M:=[[s[1]-1,s[2]],[s[1]+1,s[2]],[s[1],s[2]-1],[s[1],s[2]+1]];
T:=table(); k:=0;
for m in M do
if m[1]>=1 and m[1]<=S[1] and m[2]>=1 and m[2]<=S[2] and A1[op(m)]=0 then k:=k+1; T[k]:=subsop(m=a-1,A1);
fi;
od;
convert(T, list);
end proc;

 
OneStepRight:=proc(A1::listlist)
local s, M, m, k, T, s1;
uses ListTools;
s:=Search(a, Matrix(A1));  s1:=Search(a+2, Matrix(A1));  
M:=[[s[1]-1,s[2]],[s[1]+1,s[2]],[s[1],s[2]-1],[s[1],s[2]+1]];
T:=table(); k:=0;
for m in M do
if m[1]>=1 and m[1]<=S[1] and m[2]>=1 and m[2]<=S[2] and A1[op(m)]=0 and `if`(a+2 in L, `if`(is(abs(s1[1]-m[1])+abs(s1[2]-m[2])>1),false,true),true) then k:=k+1; T[k]:=subsop(m=a+1,A1);
fi;
od;
convert(T, list);   
end proc;

F1:=LM->ListTools:-FlattenOnce(map(OneStepLeft, LM));
F2:=LM->ListTools:-FlattenOnce(map(OneStepRight, LM));

T:=[A1];
for a in L1 do
T:=F1(T);
od;

for a in L2 do
T:=F2(T);
od;

R:=map(t->convert(t,Matrix), T);
if nops(R)=0 then return `no solutions` else R[] fi;

end proc:
> 

Numbrix := proc( M :: ~Matrix, { inline :: truefalse := false } )

local S, adjacent, eq, i, initial, j, k, kk, m, n, one, single, sol, unique, val, var, x;

    (m,n) := upperbound(M);

    initial := &and(seq(seq(ifelse(M[i,j] = 0
                                   , NULL
                                   , x[i,j,M[i,j]]
                                  )
                            , i = 1..m)
                        , j = 1..n));

    adjacent := &and(seq(seq(seq(x[i,j,k] &implies &or(NULL
                                                       , ifelse(i>1, x[i-1, j, k+1], NULL)
                                                       , ifelse(i<m, x[i+1, j, k+1], NULL)
                                                       , ifelse(j>1, x[i, j-1, k+1], NULL)
                                                       , ifelse(j<n, x[i, j+1, k+1], NULL)
                                                      )
                                 , i = 1..m)
                             , j = 1..n)
                         , k = 1 .. m*n-1));

    one := &or(seq(seq(x[i,j,1], i=1..m), j=1..n));   


    single := &not(&or(seq(seq(seq(seq(x[i,j,k] &and x[i,j,kk], kk = k+1..m*n), k = 1..m*n-1)
                                , i = 1..m), j = 1..n)));

    sol := Logic:-Satisfy(&and(initial, adjacent, one, single));
    
    if sol = NULL then
        error "no solution";
    end if;
if inline then
        S := M;
     else
        S := Matrix(m,n);
    end if;

    for eq in sol do
        (var, val) := op(eq);
        if val then
            S[op(1..2, var)] := op(3,var);
        end if;
    end do;
    S;
end proc:

           Two simple examples

> 

A:=<0,0,5; 0,0,0; 0,0,9>;
# The unique solution
NumbrixPuzzle(A);

A:=<0,0,5; 0,0,0; 0,8,0>;
# 4 solutions
NumbrixPuzzle(A);

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = 5, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 9})

  

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 3, (1, 2) = 4, (1, 3) = 5, (2, 1) = 2, (2, 2) = 7, (2, 3) = 6, (3, 1) = 1, (3, 2) = 8, (3, 3) = 9})

  

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = 5, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 8, (3, 3) = 0})

  

Matrix(%id = 18446746210121682686), Matrix(%id = 18446746210121682806), Matrix(%id = 18446746210121674750), Matrix(%id = 18446746210121674870)

 (1)


Comparison with Numbrix procedure. The example is taken from
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Solve_a_Numbrix_puzzle 

> 

 A:=<0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0;
 0, 0, 46, 45, 0, 55, 74, 0, 0;
 0, 38, 0, 0, 43, 0, 0, 78, 0;
 0, 35, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 71, 0;
 0, 0, 33, 0, 0, 0, 59, 0, 0;
 0, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 67, 0;
 0, 18, 0, 0, 11, 0, 0, 64, 0;
 0, 0, 24, 21, 0, 1, 2, 0, 0;
 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>;
CodeTools:-Usage(NumbrixPuzzle(A));
CodeTools:-Usage(Numbrix(A));

Matrix(9, 9, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = 0, (1, 4) = 0, (1, 5) = 0, (1, 6) = 0, (1, 7) = 0, (1, 8) = 0, (1, 9) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 46, (2, 4) = 45, (2, 5) = 0, (2, 6) = 55, (2, 7) = 74, (2, 8) = 0, (2, 9) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 38, (3, 3) = 0, (3, 4) = 0, (3, 5) = 43, (3, 6) = 0, (3, 7) = 0, (3, 8) = 78, (3, 9) = 0, (4, 1) = 0, (4, 2) = 35, (4, 3) = 0, (4, 4) = 0, (4, 5) = 0, (4, 6) = 0, (4, 7) = 0, (4, 8) = 71, (4, 9) = 0, (5, 1) = 0, (5, 2) = 0, (5, 3) = 33, (5, 4) = 0, (5, 5) = 0, (5, 6) = 0, (5, 7) = 59, (5, 8) = 0, (5, 9) = 0, (6, 1) = 0, (6, 2) = 17, (6, 3) = 0, (6, 4) = 0, (6, 5) = 0, (6, 6) = 0, (6, 7) = 0, (6, 8) = 67, (6, 9) = 0, (7, 1) = 0, (7, 2) = 18, (7, 3) = 0, (7, 4) = 0, (7, 5) = 11, (7, 6) = 0, (7, 7) = 0, (7, 8) = 64, (7, 9) = 0, (8, 1) = 0, (8, 2) = 0, (8, 3) = 24, (8, 4) = 21, (8, 5) = 0, (8, 6) = 1, (8, 7) = 2, (8, 8) = 0, (8, 9) = 0, (9, 1) = 0, (9, 2) = 0, (9, 3) = 0, (9, 4) = 0, (9, 5) = 0, (9, 6) = 0, (9, 7) = 0, (9, 8) = 0, (9, 9) = 0})

  

memory used=7.85MiB, alloc change=-3.01MiB, cpu time=172.00ms, real time=212.00ms, gc time=93.75ms

  

Matrix(9, 9, {(1, 1) = 49, (1, 2) = 50, (1, 3) = 51, (1, 4) = 52, (1, 5) = 53, (1, 6) = 54, (1, 7) = 75, (1, 8) = 76, (1, 9) = 81, (2, 1) = 48, (2, 2) = 47, (2, 3) = 46, (2, 4) = 45, (2, 5) = 44, (2, 6) = 55, (2, 7) = 74, (2, 8) = 77, (2, 9) = 80, (3, 1) = 37, (3, 2) = 38, (3, 3) = 39, (3, 4) = 40, (3, 5) = 43, (3, 6) = 56, (3, 7) = 73, (3, 8) = 78, (3, 9) = 79, (4, 1) = 36, (4, 2) = 35, (4, 3) = 34, (4, 4) = 41, (4, 5) = 42, (4, 6) = 57, (4, 7) = 72, (4, 8) = 71, (4, 9) = 70, (5, 1) = 31, (5, 2) = 32, (5, 3) = 33, (5, 4) = 14, (5, 5) = 13, (5, 6) = 58, (5, 7) = 59, (5, 8) = 68, (5, 9) = 69, (6, 1) = 30, (6, 2) = 17, (6, 3) = 16, (6, 4) = 15, (6, 5) = 12, (6, 6) = 61, (6, 7) = 60, (6, 8) = 67, (6, 9) = 66, (7, 1) = 29, (7, 2) = 18, (7, 3) = 19, (7, 4) = 20, (7, 5) = 11, (7, 6) = 62, (7, 7) = 63, (7, 8) = 64, (7, 9) = 65, (8, 1) = 28, (8, 2) = 25, (8, 3) = 24, (8, 4) = 21, (8, 5) = 10, (8, 6) = 1, (8, 7) = 2, (8, 8) = 3, (8, 9) = 4, (9, 1) = 27, (9, 2) = 26, (9, 3) = 23, (9, 4) = 22, (9, 5) = 9, (9, 6) = 8, (9, 7) = 7, (9, 8) = 6, (9, 9) = 5})

  

memory used=1.21GiB, alloc change=307.02MiB, cpu time=37.00s, real time=31.88s, gc time=9.30s

  

Matrix(%id = 18446746210094669942)

 (2)


In the example below, which has 104 solutions, the  Numbrix  procedure is faster.

> 

C:=Matrix(5,{(1,1)=1,(5,5)=25});
CodeTools:-Usage(NumbrixPuzzle(C)):
nops([%]);
CodeTools:-Usage(Numbrix(C)):

Matrix(5, 5, {(1, 1) = 1, (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = 0, (1, 4) = 0, (1, 5) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 0, (2, 4) = 0, (2, 5) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 0, (3, 4) = 0, (3, 5) = 0, (4, 1) = 0, (4, 2) = 0, (4, 3) = 0, (4, 4) = 0, (4, 5) = 0, (5, 1) = 0, (5, 2) = 0, (5, 3) = 0, (5, 4) = 0, (5, 5) = 25})

  

memory used=0.94GiB, alloc change=-22.96MiB, cpu time=12.72s, real time=11.42s, gc time=2.28s

  

104

  

memory used=34.74MiB, alloc change=0 bytes, cpu time=781.00ms, real time=783.00ms, gc time=0ns

  
> 

 


 

Download NumbrixPuzzle.mw

I Have a problem in Do loop...

Asked by: amrramadaneg 76
do-loop limit
July 28 2019
0  2

Dears, greeting for all

I have a problem, I try to explain it by a figure

This formula does not work.

I need to substitute n=0 to give G_n+1 as a function of the parameter s, then find the limit. 

.where G_n is a function in s.

this is the result

 

how to express eigenvector or eigenvalues in terms...

Asked by: ComputerUser 535
linear-algebra eigenvalues fibonacci
July 28 2019
0  3

how to express eigenvector or eigenvalues in terms of fibonacci or lucas or golden ratio?

fibonacci ratio has many 

f(n)/f(n-1) , all eigenvector can not divided by any one of them

 

how to verify lambda calculus is computable and re...

Asked by: ComputerUser 535
computable
July 28 2019
0  2

how to verify lambda calculus is computable and realizable in maple?

is it possible to realize lambda calculus into algebra ?

how to use β-reduction to convert algebra function into lambda calculus?

is there a way to convert back ?

how to combine multiple lambda calculus into one lambda calculus and check computable and then convert back to algebra function?

Passing variable number of arguments...

Asked by: Stretto 235
proc
July 27 2019
2  1

I'm starting to use procs a lot just because they are more general and can more easily handle complex functionality.

 

I usually have to pass a function to them and that function may or may not take a series of arguments.

 

e.g.,

 

f := (x,y,a)->a*x*y;

g := proc(q, ...)

    q(x,y,...)

end proc;

 

g(f, 3);

 

Here 3 should be passed for a(using ... to represent it).

 

If I pass a function

 

h := (x,y)->x*y

then it would be g(f)

 

I could possibly use nops, ops, arrays, etc... but looking for the right solution.

 

Generation of numbers with Cauchy distribution in ...

Asked by: DimaBrt 100
cauchy sample statistics
July 27 2019
0  2

Hello. To generate nine numbers with Cauchy distribution C(0,1) I use Sample(Random Variable(Cauchy(0, 1)), 9). Is there a way to make all generated numbers belong to the interval (-1,1)?

how to make diff(y(x),x) display as y'(x) in works...

Asked by: nm 8552
July 27 2019
2  1

I spend some time searching and reading help. But not able to find if this is possible.

I use worksheet only (i.e. not 2D document). I have my display set as

 

I'd like diff(y(x),x) to display as y'(x) in output.

I know I can do this 

PDEtools:-declare(y(x), prime = x);

And that will make diff(y(x),x) display as y'  but I want y'(x). And the same for diff(y(x),x$2) to display as y''(x). And to be clear, y(x) will still display as y(x).  I am mainly interested in making the derivative display a little nicer if possible.

Is there a way to do this?

I am using 2019.1 on windows 10.

 

Wrong values for Eigenvalues, depending on Digits ...

Asked by: Dobrica 20
linearalgebra datatype digits
July 27 2019
4  3

Hello!

I want to calculate Eigenvalues. Depending on values for digits and which datatype I choose Maple sometimes returns zero as Eigenvalues. Maybe there is a problem with the used routines: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_, CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_.

Thank you for your suggestions!
 

``

> 

 

Problems LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues, Digits, ':-datatype' = ':-sfloat', ':-datatype' = ':-complex'( ':-sfloat' )

 
> 

restart;

> 

interface( ':-displayprecision' = 5 ):
 
> 

infolevel['LinearAlgebra'] := 5;
myPlatform := kernelopts( ':-platform' );
myVersion := kernelopts( ':-version' );

5

 

"windows"

 

`Maple 2018.2, X86 64 WINDOWS, Nov 16 2018, Build ID 1362973`

(1.1)

Example 1

 
> 

A1 := Matrix( 5, 5, [[0, 1, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1], [-10201/1000, 30199/10000, -5049/250, 97/50, -48/5]] );

Matrix(5, 5, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 0, (1, 4) = 0, (1, 5) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 1, (2, 4) = 0, (2, 5) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 0, (3, 4) = 1, (3, 5) = 0, (4, 1) = 0, (4, 2) = 0, (4, 3) = 0, (4, 4) = 0, (4, 5) = 1, (5, 1) = -10201/1000, (5, 2) = 30199/10000, (5, 3) = -5049/250, (5, 4) = 97/50, (5, 5) = -48/5})

(1.1.1)
> 

LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A1 );

CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 2
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 3
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 4
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 5

 

Vector(5, {(1) = -10, (2) = 1/10+I, (3) = 1/10-I, (4) = 1/10+I, (5) = 1/10-I})

(1.1.2)
> 

A11 := Matrix( op( 1, A1 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A1[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-sfloat' );

Matrix(5, 5, {(1, 1) = 0., (1, 2) = 1.00000, (1, 3) = 0., (1, 4) = 0., (1, 5) = 0., (2, 1) = 0., (2, 2) = 0., (2, 3) = 1.00000, (2, 4) = 0., (2, 5) = 0., (3, 1) = 0., (3, 2) = 0., (3, 3) = 0., (3, 4) = 1.00000, (3, 5) = 0., (4, 1) = 0., (4, 2) = 0., (4, 3) = 0., (4, 4) = 0., (4, 5) = 1.00000, (5, 1) = -10.20100, (5, 2) = 3.01990, (5, 3) = -20.19600, (5, 4) = 1.94000, (5, 5) = -9.60000})

(1.1.3)
> 

Digits := 89;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A11 );

Digits := 89

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881249354686)

(1.1.4)
> 

Digits := 90;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A11 );

Digits := 90

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881249352150)

(1.1.5)
> 

A12 := Matrix( op( 1, A1 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A1[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-complex'( ':-sfloat' ) );

Matrix(5, 5, {(1, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 2) = 1.00000+0.*I, (1, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 3) = 1.00000+0.*I, (2, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 4) = 1.00000+0.*I, (3, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 5) = 1.00000+0.*I, (5, 1) = -10.20100+0.*I, (5, 2) = 3.01990+0.*I, (5, 3) = -20.19600+0.*I, (5, 4) = 1.94000+0.*I, (5, 5) = -9.60000+0.*I})

(1.1.6)
> 

Digits := 100;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A12 );

Digits := 100

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881249345038)

(1.1.7)
> 

Digits := 250;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A12 );

Digits := 250

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881342643606)

(1.1.8)
> 

 

> 

 

Example 2

 
> 

A2 := Matrix(3, 3, [[0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1], [3375, -675, 45]]);

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 1, (3, 1) = 3375, (3, 2) = -675, (3, 3) = 45})

(1.2.1)
> 

LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A2 );

IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Computing characteristic polynomial for a 3 x 3 matrix

IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Using prime 33554393
IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Using prime 33554383
IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Used total of  2  prime(s)

 

Vector(3, {(1) = 15, (2) = 15, (3) = 15})

(1.2.2)
> 

A21 := Matrix( op( 1, A2 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A2[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-sfloat' );

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 0., (1, 2) = 1.00000, (1, 3) = 0., (2, 1) = 0., (2, 2) = 0., (2, 3) = 1.00000, (3, 1) = 3375.00000, (3, 2) = -675.00000, (3, 3) = 45.00000})

(1.2.3)
> 

Digits := 77;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A21 );

Digits := 77

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881342621686)

(1.2.4)
> 

Digits := 78;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A21 );

Digits := 78

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881342617230)

(1.2.5)
> 

A22 := Matrix( op( 1, A2 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A2[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-complex'( ':-sfloat' ) );

Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 2) = 1.00000+0.*I, (1, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 3) = 1.00000+0.*I, (3, 1) = 3375.00000+0.*I, (3, 2) = -675.00000+0.*I, (3, 3) = 45.00000+0.*I})

(1.2.6)
> 

Digits := 58;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A22 );

Digits := 58

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881342614934)

(1.2.7)
> 

Digits := 59;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A22 );

Digits := 59

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881325525942)

(1.2.8)
> 

 

> 

 

Example 3

 
> 

A3 := Matrix(4, 4, [[0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1], [-48841, 8840, -842, 40]]);

Matrix(4, 4, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 0, (1, 4) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 1, (2, 4) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 0, (3, 4) = 1, (4, 1) = -48841, (4, 2) = 8840, (4, 3) = -842, (4, 4) = 40})

(1.3.1)
> 

LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A3 );

IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Computing characteristic polynomial for a 4 x 4 matrix
IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Using prime 33554393

IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Using prime 33554383
IntegerCharacteristicPolynomial: Used total of  2  prime(s)

 

Vector(4, {(1) = 10+11*I, (2) = 10-11*I, (3) = 10+11*I, (4) = 10-11*I})

(1.3.2)
> 

A31 := Matrix( op( 1, A3 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A3[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-sfloat' );

Matrix(4, 4, {(1, 1) = 0., (1, 2) = 1.00000, (1, 3) = 0., (1, 4) = 0., (2, 1) = 0., (2, 2) = 0., (2, 3) = 1.00000, (2, 4) = 0., (3, 1) = 0., (3, 2) = 0., (3, 3) = 0., (3, 4) = 1.00000, (4, 1) = -48841.00000, (4, 2) = 8840.00000, (4, 3) = -842.00000, (4, 4) = 40.00000})

(1.3.3)
> 

Digits := 75;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A31 );

Digits := 75

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881324662046)

(1.3.4)
> 

Digits := 76;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A31 );

Digits := 76

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881324657710)

(1.3.5)
> 

A32 := Matrix( op( 1, A3 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A3[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-complex'( ':-sfloat' ) );

Matrix(4, 4, {(1, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 2) = 1.00000+0.*I, (1, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 3) = 1.00000+0.*I, (2, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 4) = 1.00000+0.*I, (4, 1) = -48841.00000+0.*I, (4, 2) = 8840.00000+0.*I, (4, 3) = -842.00000+0.*I, (4, 4) = 40.00000+0.*I})

(1.3.6)
> 

Digits := 100;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A32 );

Digits := 100

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881324648198)

(1.3.7)
> 

Digits := 250;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A32 );

Digits := 250

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881327288182)

(1.3.8)
> 

 

> 

 

Example 4

 
> 

A4 := Matrix(8, 8, [[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1], [-1050625/20736, 529925/1296, -15417673/10368, 3622249/1296, -55468465/20736, 93265/108, -1345/8, 52/3]]);

Matrix(8, 8, {(1, 1) = 0, (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 0, (1, 4) = 0, (1, 5) = 0, (1, 6) = 0, (1, 7) = 0, (1, 8) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 0, (2, 3) = 1, (2, 4) = 0, (2, 5) = 0, (2, 6) = 0, (2, 7) = 0, (2, 8) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 0, (3, 4) = 1, (3, 5) = 0, (3, 6) = 0, (3, 7) = 0, (3, 8) = 0, (4, 1) = 0, (4, 2) = 0, (4, 3) = 0, (4, 4) = 0, (4, 5) = 1, (4, 6) = 0, (4, 7) = 0, (4, 8) = 0, (5, 1) = 0, (5, 2) = 0, (5, 3) = 0, (5, 4) = 0, (5, 5) = 0, (5, 6) = 1, (5, 7) = 0, (5, 8) = 0, (6, 1) = 0, (6, 2) = 0, (6, 3) = 0, (6, 4) = 0, (6, 5) = 0, (6, 6) = 0, (6, 7) = 1, (6, 8) = 0, (7, 1) = 0, (7, 2) = 0, (7, 3) = 0, (7, 4) = 0, (7, 5) = 0, (7, 6) = 0, (7, 7) = 0, (7, 8) = 1, (8, 1) = -1050625/20736, (8, 2) = 529925/1296, (8, 3) = -15417673/10368, (8, 4) = 3622249/1296, (8, 5) = -55468465/20736, (8, 6) = 93265/108, (8, 7) = -1345/8, (8, 8) = 52/3})

(1.4.1)
> 

LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A4 );

CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 2
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 3

CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 4
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 5
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 6
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 7
CharacteristicPolynomial: working on determinant of minor 8

 

Vector(8, {(1) = 1/3-(1/4)*I, (2) = 1/3+(1/4)*I, (3) = 4-5*I, (4) = 4+5*I, (5) = 1/3-(1/4)*I, (6) = 1/3+(1/4)*I, (7) = 4-5*I, (8) = 4+5*I})

(1.4.2)
> 

A41 := Matrix( op( 1, A4 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A4[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-sfloat' );

Matrix(8, 8, {(1, 1) = 0., (1, 2) = 1.00000, (1, 3) = 0., (1, 4) = 0., (1, 5) = 0., (1, 6) = 0., (1, 7) = 0., (1, 8) = 0., (2, 1) = 0., (2, 2) = 0., (2, 3) = 1.00000, (2, 4) = 0., (2, 5) = 0., (2, 6) = 0., (2, 7) = 0., (2, 8) = 0., (3, 1) = 0., (3, 2) = 0., (3, 3) = 0., (3, 4) = 1.00000, (3, 5) = 0., (3, 6) = 0., (3, 7) = 0., (3, 8) = 0., (4, 1) = 0., (4, 2) = 0., (4, 3) = 0., (4, 4) = 0., (4, 5) = 1.00000, (4, 6) = 0., (4, 7) = 0., (4, 8) = 0., (5, 1) = 0., (5, 2) = 0., (5, 3) = 0., (5, 4) = 0., (5, 5) = 0., (5, 6) = 1.00000, (5, 7) = 0., (5, 8) = 0., (6, 1) = 0., (6, 2) = 0., (6, 3) = 0., (6, 4) = 0., (6, 5) = 0., (6, 6) = 0., (6, 7) = 1.00000, (6, 8) = 0., (7, 1) = 0., (7, 2) = 0., (7, 3) = 0., (7, 4) = 0., (7, 5) = 0., (7, 6) = 0., (7, 7) = 0., (7, 8) = 1.00000, (8, 1) = -50.66671, (8, 2) = 408.89275, (8, 3) = -1487.04408, (8, 4) = 2794.94522, (8, 5) = -2674.98384, (8, 6) = 863.56481, (8, 7) = -168.12500, (8, 8) = 17.33333})

 (1.4.3)
> 

Digits := 74;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A41 );

Digits := 74

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881317242630)

(1.4.4)
> 

Digits := 75;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A41 );

Digits := 75

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881317239134)

(1.4.5)
> 

A42 := Matrix( op( 1, A4 ),( i,j ) -> evalf( A4[i,j] ), ':-datatype' = ':-complex'( ':-sfloat' ) );

Matrix(8, 8, {(1, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 2) = 1.00000+0.*I, (1, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (1, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 3) = 1.00000+0.*I, (2, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (2, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 4) = 1.00000+0.*I, (3, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (3, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 5) = 1.00000+0.*I, (4, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (4, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 6) = 1.00000+0.*I, (5, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (5, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (6, 7) = 1.00000+0.*I, (6, 8) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 1) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 2) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 3) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 4) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 5) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 6) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 7) = 0.+0.*I, (7, 8) = 1.00000+0.*I, (8, 1) = -50.66671+0.*I, (8, 2) = 408.89275+0.*I, (8, 3) = -1487.04408+0.*I, (8, 4) = 2794.94522+0.*I, (8, 5) = -2674.98384+0.*I, (8, 6) = 863.56481+0.*I, (8, 7) = -168.12500+0.*I, (8, 8) = 17.33333+0.*I})

 (1.4.6)
> 

Digits := 100;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A42 );

Digits := 100

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881317227806)

(1.4.7)
> 

Digits := 250;
LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues( A42 );

Digits := 250

 

Eigenvalues: calling external function
Eigenvalues: initializing the output object
Eigenvalues: using software external library
Eigenvalues: CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_

 

Vector[column](%id = 18446745881356880102)

(1.4.8)
> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

``


 

Download Problems_LinearAlgebra_Eigenvalues.mw

How do you find Fourier Transform of non-integer p...

Asked by: Nadeem_Malik 20
fourier inttrans
July 27 2019
0  5

 

Dear Maple users,

I want to find an expression for the Fourier Transform (FT) of an expression like  f(t)=exp(-t^2)/t^a, where a>0 is a constant.

I note that integer values of a (postive or negative) is ok; but non-integer fails. See sheet attached where I have tried 1 or 2 cases, a=0, 1, 0.3, etc.

So the questions are:

(1) how can I find the FT of the above for typical non-integer values of a>0 ?

(2) how can I find the FT of the above for general a -- i.e. declare a as a parameter?

 

Thanks

Nadeem


 

with(inttrans)

fourier(exp(-t^2), t, w)

exp(-(1/4)*w^2)*Pi^(1/2)

 (1)

fourier(t*exp(-t^2), t, w)

-((1/2)*I)*w*exp(-(1/4)*w^2)*Pi^(1/2)

 (2)

fourier(exp(-t^2)/t, t, w)

-I*Pi*erf((1/2)*w)

 (3)

fourier(t^.3*exp(-t^2), t, w)

fourier(t^(3/10)*exp(-t^2), t, w)

 (4)

fourier(exp(-t^2)/t^.3, t, w)

fourier(exp(-t^2)/t^(3/10), t, w)

 (5)

``


 

Download Sheet_fourier_1.mw

i want to plot a few equation with animate plot or...

Asked by: kambiz1199 170
animate plotting
July 27 2019
1  7

hi 

i want to plot this equations , i want to show that step by step and remind previous . i plot with animte plot but it do not show the previous

 

restart;
with(plottools);
co := blue;
with(plots);

t := 1;
for i from 20 by -1 to 0 do t := t+1; a[i] := -i*x/t+i; p[i] := plot(a[i], x = 0 .. 20, y = 0 .. 20, color = co, thickness = 3) end do;

plots[animate](plot, [a[k], x = 0 .. 20, y = 0 .. 20], k = [seq(i, i = 1 .. 20)]);

First 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 Last Page 534 of 2097