Hello people in Mapleprimes,

I have an expression which I want to modify with another equation.

They are simple, and looks easy to simplify.

nb:=(k-sigma+1)*lambda*L*(gamma*upsilon-delta__1122^k*tau)*upsilon*tau*v/(f__F*sigma*(-tau^2+upsilon^2)*k);

hh := (L*lambda*(k-sigma+1)*upsilon*tau*v)/(f__F*sigma*(-tau^2+upsilon^2)*k)=rho;

I want to express nb with hh as

(gamma*upsilon-delta__1122^k*tau)*rho;

With the next code, that modification can be done.

isolate(hh,f__F);subs(%,nb);simplify(%);

But, this isolates hh for f__F, which does not look intuitive.

On the other hand, the outcome of the substitution looks so simple, which you find with executing  the codes of

nb, and hh.

But, algsubs, and subs, and simplify/siderel won't work properly.

What I want to ask is this. Isn't there any nice way to substitute hh into nb other than isolating f__F, so that the result is expressed with rho?

I will be very glad if you will give me answers.

Best wishes.

taro

I am solving "Fx=0" for geting "roots:x" using "solve(Fx,x)". Solution is in the form of "a+sqrt(b)", "a-sqrt(b)". One solution "f1" is given below.

f1:=1/2*(-8*R*d1^2*r^2*C+10*d1*r^2*C*R+5*d1*r^3*C+2*r*L*d1^2-2*C*r^3+2*R*L*d1^2-R*L*d1^3-r*L*d1^3-4*C*r^2*R+2*R*d1^3*r^2*C-4*r^3*d1^2*C+r^3*d1^3*C+sqrt(26*r^6*d1^4*C^2+41*r^6*d1^2*C^2-44*r^6*d1^3*C^2-20*C^2*r^6*d1+16*C^2*r^5*R-16*C*r^4*L-176*r^5*d1^3*C^2*R+164*r^5*d1^2*C^2*R-74*r^4*d1^4*C*L+136*r^4*d1^3*C*L-136*r^4*d1^2*C*L-80*C^2*r^5*d1*R+72*C*r^4*L*d1-64*C*r^3*R*L+104*R^2*d1^4*r^4*C^2-176*R^2*d1^3*r^4*C^2+164*R^2*d1^2*r^4*C^2-8*r^6*d1^5*C^2+r^2*L^2*d1^6-4*R^2*L^2*d1^5+104*r^5*d1^4*C^2*R+40*r*L*R^3*d1^5*C-72*r*L*R^3*d1^4*C+56*r*L*R^3*d1^3*C-16*r*L*R^3*d1^2*C+R^2*L^2*d1^6+20*r^4*L*C*d1^5-32*r^4*d1^5*C^2*R^2+2*R*L^2*d1^6*r-2*r^4*L*d1^6*C+4*R^2*d1^6*r^4*C^2+4*R*d1^6*r^5*C^2-306*r^3*d1^4*C*R*L+548*r^3*d1^3*C*L*R-544*r^3*d1^2*C*R*L+288*C*r^3*L*d1*R+16*C^2*r^4*R^2+4*R^2*L^2*d1^4-16*R^2*L*d1^6*r^2*C-10*R*L*d1^6*r^3*C+r^6*d1^6*C^2-32*r^5*d1^5*C^2*R-4*r^2*d1^5*L^2-352*R^2*d1^4*r^2*C*L+580*R^2*d1^3*r^2*C*L-552*R^2*d1^2*r^2*C*L-80*d1*r^4*C^2*R^2-8*R^3*d1^6*L*C*r+88*r^3*L*C*d1^5*R+116*r^2*L*R^2*d1^5*C+4*C^2*r^6-8*r*R*L^2*d1^5+288*d1*r^2*C*R^2*L-64*C*r^2*R^2*L+8*r*L^2*d1^4*R+4*r^2*L^2*d1^4)^(1/2))/(-3*r^2*d1*L*C-6*R*d1*L*C*r+2*L*C*r^2+r^2*d1^2*L*C+4*L*C*r*R+2*R*d1^2*L*C*r);

I used the following Maple syntax

patmatch(f1,XT::algebraic+sqrt(YT::algebraic),'q1');

the answer is "false"

Is there any modification in the syntax "patmatch" is required.

Here, my question is how to separate "a" and "b" in "a+sqrt(b)" (a, b are big expressions involving many variables).

Thanking you advance for your help.

  In attached file I need to plot (R/R0 )^3  versus t for diffrent of (s) for example  s=0.01,0.005,0.003   plot.mwplot.mw

Dear Maple users

I have done some experiments with the new Workbook feature in Maple 2016. It is a very welcome addition, indeed. Earlier I have created Maple files in which data from an external Excel file was imported and being used for certain calculations. In order to make recalculations work properly, one need to let the Excel file follow the Maple file. That's where a Workbook come in handy! I tried placing those two files in a Workbook. It didn't work completely as advertised, I think. I moved the Workbook to another location on the harddrive to make sure it wouldn't interfere with the original files outside the Workbook. Then I recalculated the Maple document inside the Workbook. The good thing: The data from the Excel file was still present. The bad thing: If I changed some data in the Excel file inside the Workbook, it didn't register in the Maple file when updating it!

Maybe I should explain that I did import data from the Excel file into Maple via the menu: Tools > Assistants > Import Data... The data was retrieved as a matrix within the Maple file and assigned to a variable and used for plots ...

Why doesn't the above procedure work properly? I hope one don't need to use the Workbook URI to reference files within the workbook. It is not that userfriendly!

Regards,

Erik

I have this function:

Z := (cos((1/2)*x)-I*sin((1/2)*x))*A0/r^(1/2)+(cos((1/2)*x)+I*sin((1/2)*x))*r^(1/2)*A1+(cos(3*x*(1/2))+I*sin(3*x*(1/2)))*r^(3/2)*A2;

I wanna to obtain another function Y which equal to

Y:=f1*(Re(Z)+Re(Z'))+f2*(Im(Z)+Im(Z'));

where: f1 and f2 are constant 

thanks :)

I am solving "Fx=0" for geting "roots:x" using "solve(Fx,x)". Solution is in the form of

"a+sqrt(b)", "a-sqrt(b)"

Here my question is how to extract "a", "b" separately (a, b are complex and very big expressions).

Thank you in advance for your help.

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I think that I found a bug.

Using the screen opened with command + f, I tried to find a v__1211 in the file I appended here.

But, when the cursor is trapped on an output part, which is a blue part, maple wouldn't continue to find the next

v__1211 anymore even if I clicked the Find Next on the screen.

If I move the cursol one line below with a hand, the Find Next butttons works again, but it is intricate.

Isn't there any good way to avoid this trouble other than not using double _, that is __.?

I hope you will give me some hint.

taro

v_1211.mw

P.S. I clicked the above link and opened that file with maple. Then, the notification telling that this is read-only file and

you cannot save this file after some modification, appeared. I don't know whether there is any problem. 

Does appending a maple file on a post on this mapleprimes always done in such a way? 

The keyboard shortcut sequence for executing an entire worksheet is Alt+e+e+w. Occasionally, I hit Alt+e+w+w by accidence. In that case, Maple sometimes, not always!?, gets completely stuck and can only be shut down through the job list window (Windows Ctrl+Alt+Del). Can anybody else replicate that? And if so, has this erratically odd behaviour been fixed in later versions of Maple?

Hi,

I'm currently writing my thesis and actually haven't used Maple before.

I've got the following problem with converting the results of a sequence:

seq(Optimization:-Maximize(function with 2 variables), parameter:0..1,0.1)

The results are ok, but I can't convert the values to a spreadsheet with 4 columns (parameter value, maximum value, value of variable 1, value of variable 2).

Thank you!

Best regards

Hello everyone!

I want to plot few curves. I need plot legends with slected curves only. When I try to do so, I get an error saying the number of legends are less that the curves( not exact words obviously).

I am using this sample code please help me to achieve the goal.

plot([cos(x)^2, 1-(1/2)*x, x^2], x = -Pi .. Pi, legend = [typeset("Curve: ", cos(x)^2), typeset("Curve: ", 1-(1/2)*x)])

The maple file is attached here

legend.mw

S:=...+a^4*b*c*x^2+...

So I know it is possible to collect for example any letter collect(S,x)

But I want to collect in particular for an entire product in this case

e.g. collect(S,a^4*b*c)

This obviously doesnt work but is it possible to get it working somehow?

Hello

It has been years since I last run one of my packages (not mine actually) and consequently maple.  The package was written in Maple V and run on Maple V5.  I have used updtscr to convert the old code and not many messages came out.   The updated code does not run unfortunately.  One of the problems is the following command:

linalg[dotprod](f,map((a,b) -> diff(b,a),vars,h));

Although linalg is deprecated, that does not seem to be the problem.   Suppose h, f (vector) and vars are:

The output is:

How to avoid the conjugate? Is there a simpler way to do that?

Many thanks for your patience and help.

Regards

Ed

So I'm doing homework when I get maple to plot a graph. I realize now that the graph is actually incorrect by comparing it to a graph in another program(try it yourself).  I honestly have no clue why the plotting isn't correct which is why I need your guys help.

Here is the function that I have to plot:

Dear all,

I would like to compute numerically using Maple the following improper integral

However, Maple does seem to give a result for this integral. I have tried to compute from e.g. 0.001 as an approximation but it turns out that the integrand diverges as s goes to zero. I have also tried some options such as method = _d01amc but I get Error, (in evalf/int) powering may produce overflow.

I would appreciate it if someone here could provide with some help with regards to the computation of such improper integrals. Thank you.

Download question.mw