Where was this graphic of a mountain crater used in Maple?  The top left graphic from here http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/features/Visualization.aspx#

I haven't seen it used in any webinars nor have I seen it in the application center.  5 points to anyone who can find it :)

Hi,

I am a Maple über noob.

I am strugeling to figure out how to do simple phase calculations

For example

Phase_angle.mw

It is mainly for 3-phase angle calculation

dear all

(1-pi*x/2)y[b]-1/3=int(t^4/sqrt((t^2-y[b])^2+y[a]^2),t);

x^2*y[c](1-pi*x/2)-1/3=int(t^4/sqrt((t^2-x^2*y[c])^2+y[a]^2),t);

i want to plot y[a],y[b],y[c] vs x.

plz help me.

thank you 

Dear all

i want to plot this equation can someone help me

v=beta^(-1)(f/2)

beta=(t^(0.5);1/5,1/2)

beta is beta function i want to plot v wrt f

thanks

I wish to display the following screen output from a procedure A(), in a textbox of mathcontainer or any other suitable component.

This output to screen listing is generated by print statements in the procedure A().

I have placed the procedure call A() in a textbox and then am using a button component to execute it with the objective of displaying the above output in another component display box; either a textbox or a MathContainer box...  I can see that A() executes, but do not know how to get the result to display in a component box.

Can anyone offer any help?

hi.may  help me for solve this nonlinear equations by numeric solver maple39.d39.pdfocx39.pdf

thanks alot

file format is pdf and word type

Hi everybody,

i'm trying to do an elliptic regularization but i don't know how to proceed ?

Is someone know how to achieve to do that  with an example ?

thanks a lot !

PS: i know only how to do a linear regularisation.

I am considering the following PDE and I am getting an error, please suggest a better numerical method than the default one used in maple:

the PDE is:

u_{xx}u^3 - sin(xt)u_{tt} = u(x,t)

u(x, 0) = sin(x), (D[2](u))(x, 0) = cos(x), u(0, t) = cos(t), (D[1](u))(0, t) = sin(t)

Please suggest me a method that will also work for the following PDEs:

u^m* u_{xx} - sin(xt)u_{tt} = u^n

for m,n =0,1,2,3,... for the cases m=n and m not equal n

Here's the code:

Download nonlinear_hyperbolic_PDE.mw

Hello

anyone plz help me to find adomian decomposition method (ADM) maple code, also how to find the adomian polynomials separately using maple, i search it for a long time but did'nt succeeded,

I made reference to the show the enemy below and included part of the script an interesting part in the show. 

I did a mapleprimes search - only two returns none of which were what I was looking for.  I also did a google search which turned up nothing. 

Was my post deleted?

Good day everyone,

I want to construct groebner bases over rings of differential Operators.

Thus I used the following:

with(Ore_algebra);

with(Groebner); N := 3;

A := skew_algebra(diff = [D[1], x[1]], diff = [D[2], x[2]], diff = [D[3], x[3]], comm = i, alg_relations = i^2+1); T := MonomialOrder(A, tdeg(D[1], D[2], D[3]));

A["polynomial_indets"];  [returns    {D[1], D[2], D[3]}]

A["rational_indets"];       [returns    {i, x[1], x[2], x[3]}]

So far everything seems as it should be: The ring i wanted to define here is the third Ring of  Differential operators over the field of complex 'rational' functions and maple returns that indeed it will handle the D[i] as monomials and the rest as coefficients for them.

Hover, when i use the Skew product, the following happens:

skew_product(x[1],D[1],A)                    [returns D[1]x[1]+1}]

skew_product(x[1],D[1],A)                    [returns D[1]x[1]]

Both is wrong, but maple seems to 'know' this. It used the correct relation to in the first product, the only thing it didn't do was switch D[1] and x[1]. I think maple handles the result of the skew product as if it was a commutative product and always places the D[i] at the left but still 'knows' what the actual result is.

The actual results should have been x[1]D[1]+1 for the first and x[1]*D[1] for the second product.

In the second product, it seems like maple treated x[1]*D[1] as if the Elements were switched already.

What i want though is for maple to correctly display the skew products and return the products so that in every summand the D[i] are at the right side and their coefficients are at the left side (and if possible (i do not know how to do that yet) sort the result of a skew product in a way that displays every different Power product of the D[i] with their coefficients, so that i get (x[1]+x[2])*D[2] and not x[1]*D[2]+x[2]*D[2]).

Can anyone help me here?

I have been unable to successfully open a text file for writing in MAPLEPLAYER, whether it is requested in the startup code section or via a document tools button.  Is there a way to write to a file in MAPLEPLAYER?  It returns a "no write access" statement.

The write works perfectly in MAPLE 2015.1

MRB

Hi All,

I have o problem with simplify. A variable cp1r has been assumed to be positive. Why simplify still has csgn(cp1r) for it? Here is my code:

tmp := subs(cp1t(t)=cp1r, cp2t(t)=cp2r, Ca[2]);
1 / 2 2
----------- |-cp2r sin(x[1]) sin(x[7]) cp1r
2 2 |
cp1r cp2r |
\

2
+ 2 cp2r sin(x[1]) cos(x[1]) cos(x[7]) sin(x[7]) cp1r +

1 / 2 2 /
-------------- \cp2r cos(x[1]) cos(x[7]) sin(x[7]) \
(1/2)
/ 2\
2 \cp1r /
2 \\\
-2 cos(x[1]) cos(x[7]) sin(x[1]) + 2 sin(x[1]) cos(x[1])//|
|
|
/
assume(cp1r > 0, cp2r > 0);
simplify(tmp);
1 / / 3 3
---------- \sin(x[1]) sin(x[7]) \-cos(x[1]) cos(x[7])
2
cp1r cp1r

+ 2 cos(x[1]) cos(x[7]) cp1r csgn(cp1r) cp1r

2 3 \ \

- cp1r csgn(cp1r) cp1r + cos(x[1]) cos(x[7])/ csgn(cp1r)/

should csgn(cp1r) be simplified to 1 already? What is wrong with my script?

Thanks 

Everett

Maple does not cope with the following simple example:

with(geom3d):

point(A,0,0,0), point(B,1,0,0), point(C,2,0,0), point(E,2,1,0):

AreCoplanar(A,B,C,E);

           Error, (in geom3d:-plane) the points may not be AreCollinear

Should we interpret this behavior as a bug? I think I met with this yet 10-12 years ago, but unfortunately since then nothing has changed.