Actually I don't thinik that is what you want, you could try DrawGraph from the GraphTheory package.

Actually I don't thinik that is what you want, you could try DrawGraph from the GraphTheory package.

@Alejandro Jakubi 

Here's my reason.  I was in Typesetting:extended mode.  In your example %A doesn't work with typesetting set to extended but %a does.  That was before I found the bug in extended mode for coloring.  Then I posted the typesetting extended bug and this morning saw your message that you meant %A not %a.  So I tried it again and %A didn't work so .. I thought maybe typesetting is the problem, so I checked to see if it had an effect and in fact it does. 

@Alejandro Jakubi 

Here's my reason.  I was in Typesetting:extended mode.  In your example %A doesn't work with typesetting set to extended but %a does.  That was before I found the bug in extended mode for coloring.  Then I posted the typesetting extended bug and this morning saw your message that you meant %A not %a.  So I tried it again and %A didn't work so .. I thought maybe typesetting is the problem, so I checked to see if it had an effect and in fact it does. 

@Alejandro Jakubi 

I think you meant to write
nprintf("#mo(%a,mathcolor=\"%A\")", s, c)

The first `a` being lower case instead of upper case.

@Alejandro Jakubi 

I think you meant to write
nprintf("#mo(%a,mathcolor=\"%A\")", s, c)

The first `a` being lower case instead of upper case.

Thanks for the alternates, gives me a better understanding of the undocumented code.

I read Paulina's argument on the subject.

pchine wrote : "... other Maplesoft staff will set up polls or discussion questions elsewhere on MaplePrimes asking for input"

That is an old post but poll questions no longer exist on mapleprimes - a loss, perhaps, but those are fuzzy logic information gathering tools.  A probability based directional approach, they are helpful and should be re-implemented on mapleprimes.

Discussion questions from Maplesoft, I find are fairly few but I suppose enough outside information is gathered based on the questions that arise here on mapleprimes.  That is passive information gathering.  Aside from posting discussion questions how else (may I ask?) is Maplesoft gathering information through the `active information gathering` route?    although they probably have enough passive information to deal with.

pchin wrote : "... we are not expecting a structure like `#mi( "V" )` to be generated by a user."

I think that statement was clarified, but if a structure can be used in Maple then it should be documented regardless of whether someone may or may not be expected to use it.  Murphys Law comes to mind, if you think someone might use it but most likely won't, then it is most probable that they will.

Thanks for the alternates, gives me a better understanding of the undocumented code.

I read Paulina's argument on the subject.

pchine wrote : "... other Maplesoft staff will set up polls or discussion questions elsewhere on MaplePrimes asking for input"

That is an old post but poll questions no longer exist on mapleprimes - a loss, perhaps, but those are fuzzy logic information gathering tools.  A probability based directional approach, they are helpful and should be re-implemented on mapleprimes.

Discussion questions from Maplesoft, I find are fairly few but I suppose enough outside information is gathered based on the questions that arise here on mapleprimes.  That is passive information gathering.  Aside from posting discussion questions how else (may I ask?) is Maplesoft gathering information through the `active information gathering` route?    although they probably have enough passive information to deal with.

pchin wrote : "... we are not expecting a structure like `#mi( "V" )` to be generated by a user."

I think that statement was clarified, but if a structure can be used in Maple then it should be documented regardless of whether someone may or may not be expected to use it.  Murphys Law comes to mind, if you think someone might use it but most likely won't, then it is most probable that they will.

no no, you were right the first time.  It is standard I am referring to, and I appreciate your answer to that.  And yes the original question always did say from command line.  Although I suppose a bit of nomenclature confusion on my part, from what you would expect it to mean is not what I meant it to mean.  I have to get out of the habit of referring to the command line as a common place where code is written regardless of classic or standard or also, as in this case, a maple command line version.

TypeMK and atomic identifiers, yes, okay thanks for clearing the name up.  I was sure I read it somewhere.

I also appreciate the info on the CLI. 

So although you now know I don't use the command line interface for maple, it won't matter what shell I'm using none-the-less I mainly use Windows, still on rare occassions DOS and rarely KDE (which I mainly use for recovering/fixing broken computers.

I was originally hoping for a way to get color using printf in standard GUI.  Although I don't quite understand the atomic identifiers I'll use the method you gave.  Unless of course more ways exist.  It would be interesting to know.

no no, you were right the first time.  It is standard I am referring to, and I appreciate your answer to that.  And yes the original question always did say from command line.  Although I suppose a bit of nomenclature confusion on my part, from what you would expect it to mean is not what I meant it to mean.  I have to get out of the habit of referring to the command line as a common place where code is written regardless of classic or standard or also, as in this case, a maple command line version.

TypeMK and atomic identifiers, yes, okay thanks for clearing the name up.  I was sure I read it somewhere.

I also appreciate the info on the CLI. 

So although you now know I don't use the command line interface for maple, it won't matter what shell I'm using none-the-less I mainly use Windows, still on rare occassions DOS and rarely KDE (which I mainly use for recovering/fixing broken computers.

I was originally hoping for a way to get color using printf in standard GUI.  Although I don't quite understand the atomic identifiers I'll use the method you gave.  Unless of course more ways exist.  It would be interesting to know.

What do you call `#mo()` ?  It's not in the help file and neither is mathcolor.

Thanks for the html color code help. 

So ANSI escape sequences don't work in Standard GUI?  That figures, I couldn't find any escape sequence that worked anyway.  Also I don't believe we can print text in color using printf as I thought.

What do you call `#mo()` ?  It's not in the help file and neither is mathcolor.

Thanks for the html color code help. 

So ANSI escape sequences don't work in Standard GUI?  That figures, I couldn't find any escape sequence that worked anyway.  Also I don't believe we can print text in color using printf as I thought.

More info is needed to make a guess as to what is happenning. 

Are you on a laptop, or desktop?  Windows XP, Linux or Windows 7.  How much memory?

The situation you describe is unique, it could be a memory issue a display driver, or even a virus.  More info is needed.

Then along comes a post like this http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/126047-If-Fsolve-Miss-The-Solution-Then which defies the logic I thought above.

Replies = 3  for that thread when in fact there is 14 replies !

Sorry if I'm not understanding the meaning of number of replies in this forum but things don't add up.

For example.

The thread http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/125866-Extracting-One-Solution currently says it has one reply yet after opening the thread I see one answer followed by two comments.  I believe there exists 3 replies and should be recorded as such. 

There was another such thread that seemed to account for comments properly and record number of replies properly but I think that only occurred if the last response was an answer as showing in this thread http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/125332-Handling-Big-Dataset there are 2 comments followed by 2 answers and the reply reading displays 4 which is correct.

I might suggest there is a counter not working in the programming that doesn't catch the number of comments if they occur after an answer.