I could have sworn I saw that model in the maple application center. 

I remember seeing a simulation of the 9 link model somewhere but I can't remember where.  It might have been in a maplesim demonstration video. 

Can someone verify that?
** edit add ** funilly enough double clicking the animation above produces the animation. 

Unfortunately the link to the model is not the link to the model.

Sorry, no disrespect intended.  A single function surface is a term I made up - probably likely a misunderstanding of the terms myself - but supposed to have meant a function (equation) describing one surface, when graphed, that is not observationally separate from another created from the same equation. 

**edit deleted equation which I thought had seperate surfaces when in fact after copying over didn't pay attention to comma for second equation. 

Sorry, no disrespect intended.  A single function surface is a term I made up - probably likely a misunderstanding of the terms myself - but supposed to have meant a function (equation) describing one surface, when graphed, that is not observationally separate from another created from the same equation. 

**edit deleted equation which I thought had seperate surfaces when in fact after copying over didn't pay attention to comma for second equation. 

In Maple 12.02

Student[Calculus1][FunctionChart](x*exp(1/x));

Student[Calculus1][FunctionChart](x*exp(1/x),x=0..5);

Student[Calculus1][FunctionChart](x*exp(1/x),x=-1..5);

Student[Calculus1][FunctionChart](x*exp(1/x),x=-2..5);

And time just for interest sakes

st := time();
p := Student[Calculus1][FunctionChart](x*exp(1/x)):
time()-st;

                                    0.219

Nice to see a 16.02 update.  I wonder if we will see a 16.03 update before Maple 17?  As we near the end of the Maple 16 lifecycle of improvements I think it best to dig up and add to the Maple 17 wishlist. 

However if there still exists improvements in the works for Maple 16 then one last update fix prior to 17's release I'm sure would be much appreciated. 

This is impossible for a single function surface.  Piecewise functions make things un-impossible.

Are we saying we can't create a klein bottle (or boys surface) in Maple without obstructions in the way?

This is impossible for a single function surface.  Piecewise functions make things un-impossible.

Are we saying we can't create a klein bottle (or boys surface) in Maple without obstructions in the way?

An explicit maple example would be helpful (I hate theorems)

Or if someone were to show boy's or the klein surface in maple without crossing surfaces would be even better.

The tricky part I suppose is trying to show it in Maple

An explicit maple example would be helpful (I hate theorems)

Or if someone were to show boy's or the klein surface in maple without crossing surfaces would be even better.

The tricky part I suppose is trying to show it in Maple

Just a quick question.  Is month 0 Jan? then month 11 is Dec.  and month 12 is also Jan then. 

I think you just solve separately.  One at x(0)=0 then use another dsolve for the x(0)=1 condition.

I don't think you can use dsolve to solve multiple initial conditions simultaneously.

Okay found it.  Similar but not at all the same.  I was recalling the chinese shadows graphic from this question here
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/127088-Creating-A-2D-Plot-From-A-3D-Plot

While it is not exactly the same shape, it jogged my memory that maybe it was.   Luckily didn't have to search long to answer that question. 

Okay found it.  Similar but not at all the same.  I was recalling the chinese shadows graphic from this question here
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/127088-Creating-A-2D-Plot-From-A-3D-Plot

While it is not exactly the same shape, it jogged my memory that maybe it was.   Luckily didn't have to search long to answer that question. 

Curiously I am vaguely recalling a post with a similar graphic to the above but the topic evades me at the moment.  Can't recall if it had to do with transparency or not but the graphic looks quite familiar or similar at least.