ComputerUser

535 Reputation

10 Badges

12 years, 210 days

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

Seldom to ask question after retired math hobby Just waiting for beauty who born in 1994 And waited for her email to mavio@protonmail.com What is the difference in ownership among different universe?

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by ComputerUser

succeed, really works

succeed, really works

how about adding a initial condition

 

pdsolve({(Diff(f(x, y), x, y, x, y))*x+(Diff(f(x, y), x, y))*y = 0, f(0, 0) = 1}, f(x, y))

 

actually i do not know which intial condition are needed

how about adding a initial condition

 

pdsolve({(Diff(f(x, y), x, y, x, y))*x+(Diff(f(x, y), x, y))*y = 0, f(0, 0) = 1}, f(x, y))

 

actually i do not know which intial condition are needed

i has using this differential equation to get a pdf.

however, it seems the input binomial make the graph bad.

if this differential equation solution is not a pdf, then what is f ?

i has using this differential equation to get a pdf.

however, it seems the input binomial make the graph bad.

if this differential equation solution is not a pdf, then what is f ?

@Carl Love 

i guess this equation is crafted from all kinds of distribution, in other words, it may be from inverse direction. 

hope that can be solved in future by other method

@Carl Love 

 

T := 1/x!*Eval(Diff(g(z)^x, z$(x-1)), z=0) = n*x;
dsolve(T, g(z));
solve(T, g(z));

 

how to solve after using Eval,

actually right hand side can be any function such as binomial(n,k)*.....etc

 

can summation in this way?

as i find some pattern of this

 

L := Summation(Summation(g(m, n)-g(m-1, n)-g(m, n-1), m = 1 .. 2), n = 1 .. 2);
Matrix([[0, g(0,1), g(0,2)],[g(1,0), g(1,1), 0],[g(2,0), 0, g(2,2)]]);

can summation in this way?

as i find some pattern of this

 

L := Summation(Summation(g(m, n)-g(m-1, n)-g(m, n-1), m = 1 .. 2), n = 1 .. 2);
Matrix([[0, g(0,1), g(0,2)],[g(1,0), g(1,1), 0],[g(2,0), 0, g(2,2)]]);

i understand now, use 'hyporesult'(A,B) 

i understand now, use 'hyporesult'(A,B) 

@Carl Love 

https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=E0ED7271C68BE47C!357

this formula come from this picture.

how to rsolve it?

is it possible to define my own notation, for example implication, deduceto,

resultinhypothesis( Conj(A,B) , C ) which in book is |<

is it possible to define my own notation, for example implication, deduceto,

resultinhypothesis( Conj(A,B) , C ) which in book is |<

First 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Last Page 37 of 45