ComputerUser

535 Reputation

10 Badges

12 years, 205 days

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

Seldom to ask question after retired math hobby Just waiting for beauty who born in 1994 And waited for her email to mavio@protonmail.com What is the difference in ownership among different universe?

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by ComputerUser

@Rouben Rostamian  

actually i do not know which vector field can make it draw source and sink.

after search

http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=plots/fieldplot3d

r = sqrt(a(t)^2+b(t)^2+c(t)^2);
fld := [a(t)/r,b(t)/r,c(t)/r];

i choose vector field above

how to make it do not depend on t?

in equations, there are a(t), b(t) and c(t)

@Preben Alsholm 

i feel that the title is another question and goal, i ask in another post, if i add another link, it may be thought as duplicate post and being deleted.

@Kitonum 

if using 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9%E2%80%93Hopf_theorem

to promise that there is sink and source, how to do?

 

i add sphere equation still can not see the arrow

ode1:=a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))=3*t:
ode2:=a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*b(t)*(diff(b(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))=3*t:
ode3:=a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*b(t)*(diff(b(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))=2*t:
subs({diff(a(t), t)=A,diff(b(t), t)=B,diff(c(t), t)=C}, {ode1,ode2,ode3}):
solve(%,{A,B,C});
allvalues(%);
Sys:=subs({A=diff(a(t), t),B=diff(b(t), t),C=diff(c(t), t),a(t)^2+b(t)^2+c^2(t)=1}%[1]);
DEtools[DEplot3d](Sys,[a(t),b(t),c(t)],t=0..3,a=0..3,b=0..3,c=0..3,[[a(1)=1,b(1)=2,c(1)=3]],scene=[a(t),b(t),c(t)], linecolor=red, axes=normal, orientation=[30,65]);

@Preben Alsholm 

i understandstand now, 

it has two system sys1 and sys2,

how to draw arrow diagram to see whether has sink or source?

@tomleslie 

i random select 3 boundary conditions

a(1) = 0, b(1) = 0, c(1) = 0

or

a(0) = 0, b(0) = 0, c(0) = 0

@Preben Alsholm 

how to plot 3 equations with 3 unknowns

a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))


a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*b(t)*(diff(b(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))

a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))+a(t)*(diff(a(t), t))*b(t)*(diff(b(t), t))*c(t)*(diff(c(t), t))

@Preben Alsholm 

is there a systematic method to search initial condition automatically to apply it to all cases of system of differential equations in general?

i think your testing condition is one of step to terminate before looping.

If there is a good initial condition, I can just use above testing code to search the best differential ideal from thousands system.

moreover, I feel time variant solution has problem, in fact I search time invariant solution. This make me feel difficult to  think application of system.

@Preben Alsholm 

i choose one or zero. I do not know roots without solve. which roots allowed to choose?

which initial conditions are suitable for system which in a(t)*diff(a(t),t) form 's system?

@Kitonum 

actually i doing this kind of combination

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32055730/exception-prelude-index-too-large-error

 

i meet difficulty in haskell, hope to do similar and better things in maple

@Rouben Rostamian  

 

originally i do it in F# and Haskell, but i feel that maple is more convenient , but i do not know how to make a combination of tree to archieve this.

I would like to search and validate a definition satisfy eeval1eeval2eeval3eeval4 and print the result definitions

If I define f, it could be x+yx*y, and g could be x+yx*y and run through a combinations of them, which can have 4 combinations if the each possible definition satisfy four combinations, then it is true definition

Current MA and MB function can only be as a operator + and *, and have redundant combinations such as some do not have both MA and MB

 

eeval1 :: Mree Double -> Double
eeval1 (Meaf x)= x
eeval1 (Mode l And r)= eeval1 l * eeval1 r
eeval1 (Mode l Or r)= eeval1 l + eeval1 r
eeval1 (Mode l MA r)= eeval1 l + eeval1 r
eeval1 (Mode l MB r)= eeval1 l + eeval1 r

eeval2 :: Mree Double -> Double
eeval2 (Meaf x)= x
eeval2 (Mode l And r)= eeval2 l * eeval2 r
eeval2 (Mode l Or r)= eeval2 l + eeval2 r
eeval2 (Mode l MA r)= eeval2 l + eeval2 r
eeval2 (Mode l MB r)= eeval2 l * eeval2 r

eeval3 :: Mree Double -> Double
eeval3 (Meaf x)= x
eeval3 (Mode l And r)= eeval3 l * eeval3 r
eeval3 (Mode l Or r)= eeval3 l + eeval3 r
eeval3 (Mode l MA r)= eeval3 l * eeval3 r
eeval3 (Mode l MB r)= eeval3 l + eeval3 r

eeval4 :: Mree Double -> Double
eeval4 (Meaf x)= x
eeval4 (Mode l And r)= eeval4 l * eeval4 r
eeval4 (Mode l Or r)= eeval4 l + eeval4 r
eeval4 (Mode l MA r)= eeval4 l * eeval4 r
eeval4 (Mode l MB r)= eeval4 l * eeval4 r

@Christopher2222 

i guess that i need to reinstall maple 18 , before that i install maple sim 7.01

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

i just restart maple 18 again and paste code to clean console.

Please see my real case.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bxs_ao6uuBDUcDFiQVRmcHBJeXM/view?usp=sharing

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

i use the upgrade file of 7.01 in my installation folder after upgrade to 7.01

still have the same error when do simulation

then i download the 3 files in the official web.

i can not upgrade again because it has already been upgraded.

is there any difference between old upgrade file and the upgrade file in official web?

do i need to uninstall maple sim 7.01 and install again?

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

 

maple sim 7

@Preben Alsholm 

 

actually i I am searching calabI yau equation from all combinations, but it seems need a*diff(,a)

First 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Last Page 23 of 45