I don't see your point.

k is assigned as stated by k=0..0 in sum(0^k, k = 0 .. 0).

k is the sum iterator and takes 0 as its unique value. 

Thus 0^k in the context of the sum is assigned/correct. 

I still don't see why sum(0^k,k=0..0) would not return 0^0 that, according to maple evaluates to 1.

Anyone?

I don't see your point.

k is assigned as stated by k=0..0 in sum(0^k, k = 0 .. 0).

k is the sum iterator and takes 0 as its unique value. 

Thus 0^k in the context of the sum is assigned/correct. 

I still don't see why sum(0^k,k=0..0) would not return 0^0 that, according to maple evaluates to 1.

Anyone?

Thanks for your answer about what Maple is doing.

It still does not make sense to me why Maple is doing this (I even think that this should be considered as an error).

Comment anyone?

Regards

Thanks for your answer about what Maple is doing.

It still does not make sense to me why Maple is doing this (I even think that this should be considered as an error).

Comment anyone?

Regards