Mariusz Iwaniuk

1476 Reputation

14 Badges

10 years, 33 days

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by Mariusz Iwaniuk

Maple can't solve PDE with numerics.

@JonMcLoone 

When will we see the version 12.1 ?

Mathematica have only up to 2*10^14.

@mahmood1800 

For first question:

You have 6  conditions:

1. f3(0,t)=-exp(-2*t)

2. f4(x,0)=exp(-3*x)*cos(2*Pi*x)

3. f1(x,3)=0

4. f1(3,t)=0

5. f2(x,3)=0

6. f2(3,t)=0

and we have a  5 constants,one condition is too much.

For second question:

No,is not true and not allowed.

Regards M.I

@aabdulla 

I don't know the answer to your question. I'm just a regular user, not a MAPLE developer.

@aabdulla 

With corrected syntax I able to solve integral with Maple.

See attached file.

Integrals_Sheet2-BB.mw

@Kitonum

eval(FR, [a = 0, b = 2, k = 2, l = 2]) # is Zero not TRUE ?

int(eval(sqrt(1 + k^2*Pi^2*cos(Pi*x/l)^2/l^2), [l = 2, k = 2]), x = 0 .. 2, numeric)#4.609785323 OK.

You Can optimize gif so that the file would take up smaller capacity.

@Axel Vogt 

Yes you have right.Definition in Maple is:

F(w) = int(f(t)*exp(-I*w*t), t = -infinity .. infinity)

but in Mathematica is:

F(w) = *1/sqrt(2 Pi))*int(f(t)*exp(I*w*t), t = -infinity .. infinity)

@NaeemQau 

Add a numeric value for alpha ? and Then You have "too many boundary conditions: expected 22, got 23"?

Exit and Alt+F4 works as intended in Windows 10 Home build 1809 on Maple 2019.2.  

Do you have any reason to believe that a closed form symbolic(analytic) solution should exist? Questions like this should always indicate why it is reasonable to expect a solution. 

@johncarl 

int(1/(c*x + d)^2, x = a .. b) assuming a < b, 0 < a, 0 < c, 0 < d;

#-(-b + a)/((a*c + d)*(b*c + d))

 

 

int(y^2*exp(-I*omega*y), y = -infinity .. infinity);

#undefined

@Mohamed19 

Add a new Question   to MaplePrimes.It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. 

 

Regards M.I.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Last Page 7 of 30