I'm a bit confused by your worksheet: in its second part, you assign q:=p*9, but then you call patmatch(p,...) again. Shouldn't that be patmatch(q,...) instead? That runs much quicker and less memory-hungry. However, I tried in current Maple 2015.1 only.

Note that 18.01 was not the last update for Maple 18. Check out http://www.maplesoft.com/support/downloads/m18_02update.aspx which mentions improvements in memory management.

Did you know this MathApp? It does not derive the equations you are asking for, but they are implemented in its Startup code.

Maplets are not supported by the Maple Player, but embedded components are. From another post of yesterday it seems you found out already. ;-)

The student edition is technically identical to professional / academic editions.

But CUDA can be tricky. Whether it works depends (at least) on graphics hardware and driver.
However, you should either get true or false, or possibly an error message from the routine itself. The one you quoted points to some other issue, unrelated to CUDA.

Can you load other packages? If not, then your installation is probably broken, and you should reinstall.

There are several things wrong here:

The Maple environment variable Digits needs a capital D, whereas digits has no special meaning.

HelpBGColor is defined in the GUI settings (unfortunately named Maple.ini under Windows, but typically located under C:\Users\<your_account_name>\AppData\Roaming\Maple\18, at least on my Windows 7 system). Remove that line from your maple.ini, it will have no effect there (and it's technically not even an assignment, but rather an equation).

Place your user-defined maple.ini your home directory, which is typically C:\Users\<your_account_mame>. It can be queried in Maple with kernelopts(homedir), by the way.

I think it's designed for univariate polynomials only, but maybe the Coeff command of the MatrixPolynomialAlgebra package will help. You may need to nest those calls to cover the multivariate case - just a guess.

Due to the presence of sqrt, your equation is non-polynomial, so fsolve will return one solution only - please see ?fsolve section "Basic Information / Output".

To obtain the other solution, provide a starting value for the iteration, like x=-1.4 (plot the l.h.s. to see the location of its zeros). Alternatively, use something like

all_roots := Student:-Calculus1:-Roots(-x^2 + 2*x + 5 + (x^2 + 2*x - 1)* sqrt(2 - x^2)=0, x);

Which version are you running? From MapleSim 7 on, you can toggle views (Construct vs Simulation Results (incl. Playback)) using the vertical tabs at the left border of the Visualization Window. Alternatively, use the View menu of the main MapleSim window.

In earlier versions, toggle via the "gear(s)" button below the 3D scene. Menu entry: View > Toggle 3D View Mode

I have no experience with that topic, but your starting point would be the ?fracdiff help page, I guess.

Depending on what type of output you get (a sequence? an expression? etc) and how it's structured, the elision feature might help as well. For interactive usage, check Tools > Options > Precision > Term elision. These values can also be set programmatically with the interface command.

It sounds like an interesting task, but I'm afraid nobody will type in your matrix. Please upload your worksheet here, using the green arrow-up button. Alternatively, post your input as plain text so that we can copy&paste it.

My guess is that the simplify command with option 'wronskian' will be helpful here...

This has nothing to do with computational resources per se, but you have hit the degree threshold from which on sum automatically converts such geometric sums:

sum(x^i,i=0..999);

And then coeff cannot do its job. I don't know if one can change that threshold, but the recommendation for most finite sums is to use add instead of sum. That will actually tackle much higher degrees.

This is because uipj and uimj are of type 'series' (whattype(uipj) will reveal it). To remove the order terms, use

convert(uimj+uipj,polynom);

which will do the simplification on the fly.

For future inquiries, please don't post code in a bitmap image. Use plain text so that we can copy&paste your input, or upload a worksheet, using the green arrow-up buttom of the editor.

I suggest that you contact our Dutch distributor who is also located in Amsterdam (nice location, by the way!): http://www.can.nl

 Update: and don't miss the opportunity to visit André Heck: https://staff.fnwi.uva.nl/a.j.p.heck/

This feature was requested frequently, so Maple 2015 brings an easy solution:

max[index]([1,2,3,7,6,5,4]);

If you have that version, please see ?updates,Maple2015,language for more info.