Thanks Robert! I searched Maple help but could not find anything. I am grateful for your link. I will try it out and ask again if I get into problems ...

Regards, Erik

Thanks Robert! I searched Maple help but could not find anything. I am grateful for your link. I will try it out and ask again if I get into problems ...

Regards, Erik

Your intention of separating general discussions about Maple from specific questions which have a solution might be fruitful, but I don't find the word "Posts" a good choice. Actually I was very confused myself when I entered the updated MaplePrimes today. Until I found this thread I did not know where to ask about my Maple problem. The word "Posts" is very often used for what is here called "Questions". Eventually try writing "Post a question" or "Posts in Forum" or the like in Google and watch how much stuff is coming up.

I don't think the word "Discussion" will do it either. And "Topic" probably neither. I suggest you try searching for another word, which do not get confused with "Questions". If you cannot find any appropriate word, then maybe this whole idea of making this distinction is not necessary ...

Regards, Erik

Nice! This makes map even more attractive!

Erik V.

Nice! This makes map even more attractive!

Erik V.

Thank you so much. I appreciate both solutions. The first one doesn't need the little strange ~, whereas the latter doesn't need a call for the LinearAlgebra package. Pretty nice solutions both!

Regards, Erik V.

Thank you so much. I appreciate both solutions. The first one doesn't need the little strange ~, whereas the latter doesn't need a call for the LinearAlgebra package. Pretty nice solutions both!

Regards, Erik V.

Thanks a lot. That made the trick!!

Erik V.

Thanks a lot. That made the trick!!

Erik V.

Thank you so much, Scott! You are right it works well. I am however still puzzled about the logic behind this syntax: When t runs from 0 to 100[[years]], then t[[years]] should run from 0 to100 [[years]]^2 in my World. Is Maple totally consistent here?Anyway I appreciate your answer!

Regards, Erik V.

Thank you so much, Scott! You are right it works well. I am however still puzzled about the logic behind this syntax: When t runs from 0 to 100[[years]], then t[[years]] should run from 0 to100 [[years]]^2 in my World. Is Maple totally consistent here?Anyway I appreciate your answer!

Regards, Erik V.

Right, but still it is annoying to have to strip off units to be able to make this plot, after having solved the first part of the exercise using units. Almost the same command lines need to be written twice. I simply don't understand why Maple can't handle this situation: It is clear and unambigious what units are being used for the independent variable t and the units for the dependent variabel A! 

Regards, Erik V.

Right, but still it is annoying to have to strip off units to be able to make this plot, after having solved the first part of the exercise using units. Almost the same command lines need to be written twice. I simply don't understand why Maple can't handle this situation: It is clear and unambigious what units are being used for the independent variable t and the units for the dependent variabel A! 

Regards, Erik V.

I appreciate your reply. I didn't find that functionality myself in the help menu. Big thanks!

Regards, Erik V.

I appreciate your reply. I didn't find that functionality myself in the help menu. Big thanks!

Regards, Erik V.