@ecterrab 

Thanks

Its impossible for me to understand this excactly without to see a video example
That should be the best approach.

In a worksheet i start with Maple syntax ( writing text /math ) and then i can also convert it ? 

@Carl Love 

Thanks!

Reading your findings about Maple i think i can conclude that the worksheetmode ( not classic ) is the best choice to go for

The 1D input is the most reliable input as i understand and userfriendly math input ( 2D ) seems to be too complicated with a lot of errors for doing serious math.

I remember the worksheet maple from 2000 to 2004 when i studied for math teacher( B ed) and now i am doing some recreational math and need Maple again, for doing some algebraic simplification, differentation and what else more?.
Its a new encounter with Maple after so many years.
Programming is also awesome in Maple  , but never understood the procedures handling exactly and can't blame of course myself for this because, needed is a programming skill.

Let me look how i can learn the new worksheet mode ...  

@vv 

Thanks

I looked at the modern worksheet and thinking on the past to classic worksheet ( red commands + ;)  )
Should see some documentexamples from the current worksheetmode .. how to use this mode (what's possible now for math input)

Maybe it is handier mathematical to use the latest worksheet mode  

@ 

Thanks

Well i can go for  both modes and years back the worksheet mode was different then it now is ofcourse

But classic worksheet mode is possible as you mentioned it, but is it not better to use the modern worksheet mode?  
So , i must learn again for both modes

As i understand most commands in worksheet mode and documentmode are the same ?

@ 

Microsoft Edge is new browser instead of Explorer (obselote) .. Edge browser ,a shortcut from this Ege browser on my desktop is not easy possible ( Its incredible that this microsoft company comes up with this stupid Edge functionality)

Back to Maple now is also not that easy because in the worksheetmode what i years back used was, is now probably better
I must startover learn again how to handle this new worksheetmode , because the calculations output do now have a number assigned to it. 

It seems to also possible to use not a  ; (semicolon?)  after the commands ( that  more usefriendly) and also no red colored commands are possible?

@tomleslie 

Thanks

It seems that the worksheetmode now is different from the old Maple back in 2004 and used a few years later
That's has been a ongoing development in Maple his userfriendlyness

So i must get now used to a new worksheetmode also ...

Thanks for the help!

Thanks for the help

i am not using Maple 2020 version, so the two large buttons are hopefully also on a earlier version

Yes, i think using again the Worksheet mode, that's most easy if don't know nothing about document mode 

Still find it a difficult UI what 's not very intuiative  

@Carl Love 

Thanks for this .. ti try it out

Jan

@Carl Love 

This m file must then probably stored in a special folder ..or was the path not correct 
Why it was not working with me this m file 
Perhaps it has t do that  i made a code block( that is not allowed ?) ..like a execution block
I try to learn more about programming in Maple

Thanks
Jan

@Carl Love 

Got a problem with the link feature (javascript).. it doesn't  it work anymore and how about for .m files ?

Jan

@Carl Love 

showstat(`mod`);

gives .. error , got internal error in typesetting:"Parse: internal error in PostprocessingRec: mod"

The same type of error for ..

before:= {anames(`module`)}:
read "e:\\Mapleprocdrspsmbestanden/fractions.m":
newmods:= {anames(`module`)} minus before;

I don't know if there are modules inside this fractions.m 

Jan  

@Carl Love 

I try to get the name of procedure(s) in the fractions.m

read "e:\\Mapleprocdrspsmbestanden/fractions.m";

How do i know that maple uses correct this library file ? 

before:= {anames(procedure)}:
read "e:\\Mapleprocdrspsmbestanden/fractions.m":
newprocs:= {anames(procedure)} minus before;

newprocs:= {mod} 
Is the name of the procedure in the library file ..mod?

MyProc, do

showstat(MyProc); 

Jan

Thank you very much!

Is it possible to read the whole procedure also, because to know the names only of the new procedures is not what i only want.

I am curious what the content of the new procedures are.

Jan

It seem sthat Maple is not suited to make some lessons for the secondary teaching
Making a simple numberline .. is troublesome and making some other illustrations too ..triangles, and other things.

Some illustrations are not connected with a x-axis ,y-axis ?