vv

12453 Reputation

19 Badges

10 years, 50 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by vv

@Kitonum 

Of course, but the workaround often works when the locus is not known.
And after all your example is a (degenerate) ellipse.

@Kitonum 

But once we are aware of the (inherent!) problem, workarounds are possible. E.g.
plots:-implicitplot(f(x,y)=d+1e-5, x=0..6, y=0..6, gridrefine=5);

 

@student_md 

The main advantage is that you can edit it (or even create it with a text editor).

An .m file (internal format) loads faster, but your file is small and does not matter.

@peter2108 
You already have writebytes for this.

@ecterrab 

I just want to note that in the first integral (J), the change of variables was not done at all. J was simply rewritten using intat.

@Rouben Rostamian  

The EPS export for 3D is (and was) totally wrong (at least in Windows 64 bit).
plot3d(x^2+y^2, x=-1..1,y=-1..1);
(I have posted twice the result in the past.)

@tomleslie 
The same version and OS.

The worksheet executes correctly for me.

@Christian Wolinski

collect(evala(Norm((lhs-rhs)(A))),Y,`convert/parfrac`);

@Carl Love 
Yes, I have corrected.

@Carl Love 

No, I din not think much about it. But it seems that a more general fact is true.
If p is a fixed prime and 2 <= k <= p-2 is also fixed then the events
A = {a in {1,...,p-1} :  a is prime} and
B = {a in {1,...,p-1} : a^k mod p  is prime}
are "asymptotically independent". For k=p-2 one obtains the inverses mod p.

@Carl Love 

Actually the two events are not independent (for a fixed p). They seem to have some kind of "asymptotic independence" (p --> oo).
It's interesting your intuition about this!

@acer 

It could be that the integral is exactly 1/8 but I have not time now to check.

@digerdiga 

The numerical integration is easier for rectangular domains and it is always possible to reduce the integral to such domains via a change of variables.
Note that we may include the domain D in a larger rectangle R and define the function 0 in R \ D but this is not the best solution because the new function is (generally) not continuous.

@brian bovril 

This version of alphametics is much faster and uses an intelligent algorithm (not the brute force one). It works even for systems of "equations".
The author is Robert Israel.

First 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 Last Page 69 of 166