Axel Vogt

5821 Reputation

20 Badges

20 years, 267 days
Munich, Bavaria, Germany

MaplePrimes Activity


These are answers submitted by Axel Vogt

if you have 1.0/4.0 the compiler will treat it like 0.25 anyway, but for 1/4 take care for type conversion
if that plot is ok for this value you can use subs(Pi=Pi + 1e-12, %)
Actually I am a bit astonished: you want to write a thesis and instead of scanning your literature for methods and models you ask for software? If your terminus is standard than even Google might help and already the first entry leads to Wikipedia ... Anyway ... if I recall readings & discussions in Economics vaguely but correctly the magic word is utility function and you want to estimate a pdf from 'bins', your 'extremes' stand for the tails. You have to decide for models (plus have in mind what J Tarr told you), software is the least aspect ... Hope it helps ...
Thx! Ok, I can follow. The other is something which worked in older versions (0
J:=int(whatever);
A:=unapply( J, x,y,z);
Then A is a function of x,y,z for the expression given by the integral
I mean not the prove, I mean the approach or ansatz
the identity is true (of course), but how you came up with this?
for me it works ... try to use 'restart', may be you have something else in your sheet?
  V:=convert(VAR,rational);
  simplify(V,size);
  length(V); # gives me 1298 characters using Maple 11
i would search for Fortran libs instead of trying to convert from Maple if wanting a "stand alone" version. have you looked at netlib, especially http://www.netlib.org/slatec/
it really would be helpful to support *easy* input of ASCII text with fixed fonts ...
do not try that: Maple is not for type setting ...
I always wanted to have two possible y-axes, one to the left, the other to the right. For example to plot a function approximation f(x) and its errors err(x) as one graphic. In Excel that's easy: mark a plotted function and choose the axis for displaying values.
I always hated this notation (and that for RootOf) ... 1) Is it possible to show all the strange symbols? Yes, try theIndets:=indets(indets(sol,atomic)), if sol is your solution 2) Does Maple use the assumptions given through the notations? Yes, try map( getassumptions, theIndets): op(%); 3) Can one extract and replace the symbols by more readable once (and 'norm' them, as repeated use changes through 'indexing')? Hm ... yes, but I have no friendly way ... and one has to add the assumptions for the new symbols
thanks for the answers and funny wordings :-) the reason is an "old" discussion on simplification by Carl Devore and Robert Israel (which is one of the rare cases where Google does not map the postings, here is the last post it needs inert forms in some cases Also check a possible bug in the routine, cf a posting by Walter Roberson, here Edited (10 Jun 2007) to beautify and point to an additional thread.
First 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 Page 87 of 92