Upon closer look this doesn't work

You should have got    ["345","532","6422"]

Upon closer look this doesn't work

You should have got    ["345","532","6422"]

I see some similarities in this site and the going to be new mapleprimes site.  Were some ideas used from this website?

Just lettin you know on dial up - the typing delay is gone(fixed). 

I'll be able to test my home low speed dialup tonight when I get home to see how it works, I can hopefully let you know by tonight but if not it won't be until tomorrow night.

Will you have implemented the fix for better acces for dial-up users by then?

However the larger the window size more of the information is lost at the ends of the list.  It's not really a reduction in data points the way I thought.  

However the larger the window size more of the information is lost at the ends of the list.  It's not really a reduction in data points the way I thought.  

Whoops right, thanks.  My mistake I forgot about the window size value. 

Whoops right, thanks.  My mistake I forgot about the window size value. 

I still have the same number of data points.  How can I reduce that number with minimal loss of basic shape information.

I still have the same number of data points.  How can I reduce that number with minimal loss of basic shape information.

Thanks alex_01 but the BSpline method looks easier. 

The MovingAverage method doesn't work on a list of [x,y] data points.  You first have to seperate them and then average them and then recombine (there must be a simpler command for that).  This is what I came up with before I saw the BSpine way (thanks Alec).  Here's what I came up with using the MovingAverage method.

with(plots):
with(Statistics):
a := [[1, 1], [3, 2], [3.5, 4], [4, 6], [5, 5], [6, 7], [7, 6], [8, 5], [9, 5.5], [10, 4], [11, 1], [12, -5], [11.5, -6], [12, -12], [10, -10], [8, -14], [7, -10], [3, -10], [2, -5], [1, -8], [0, 0], [1, 1]]:
b:=[seq(op(1,(op(i,a)),i=1..nops(a))]:
c:=[seq(op(2,(op(i,a)),i=1..nops(a))]:
bb:=MovingAverage(b,2):
cc:=MovingAverage(c,2):
dd:=[seq([bb[i],cc[i]],i=1.nops(bb))]:
listplot(dd)
or plot(dd) will work too

Thanks alex_01 but the BSpline method looks easier. 

The MovingAverage method doesn't work on a list of [x,y] data points.  You first have to seperate them and then average them and then recombine (there must be a simpler command for that).  This is what I came up with before I saw the BSpine way (thanks Alec).  Here's what I came up with using the MovingAverage method.

with(plots):
with(Statistics):
a := [[1, 1], [3, 2], [3.5, 4], [4, 6], [5, 5], [6, 7], [7, 6], [8, 5], [9, 5.5], [10, 4], [11, 1], [12, -5], [11.5, -6], [12, -12], [10, -10], [8, -14], [7, -10], [3, -10], [2, -5], [1, -8], [0, 0], [1, 1]]:
b:=[seq(op(1,(op(i,a)),i=1..nops(a))]:
c:=[seq(op(2,(op(i,a)),i=1..nops(a))]:
bb:=MovingAverage(b,2):
cc:=MovingAverage(c,2):
dd:=[seq([bb[i],cc[i]],i=1.nops(bb))]:
listplot(dd)
or plot(dd) will work too

I'm sorry I have to write this post but I was just over there.  I'm here on the old mapleprimes because there is no typing delay

The number one issue is typing in a comment.  Extremely slow.  I am on dial up, high speed users may not experience this but I type maybe 6 words in a row then have to wait 20 to 30 seconds for my sentence to appear.  That is pain. 

I have a regular monitor (not widescreen) and there is a lot of unused blank space at the sides (maybe they'll add to it later) but right now it's pretty wastefull.

You can only view 4 questions at most - this is also painful.  The content (question and summary) is not highlighted enough.  I'm really sorry about the use of the site but to me it is confusing.  Very pretty though, however doesn't mean anything if you can't use it well.

I couldn't find a question summary page, and those giant user headings WOW lots of real-estate space wasted on highlighting who is posting the question. 

The thumbs down is a neat idea but I think is a bad one.  Although I should hope not but someone may decide that he/she does not like someone because of what he/she posted at some earlier time and just thumbs down on him/her when he can.  Now suppose this is an important post with some good information inside, would it not get shuffled to the end of the line?  On the new mapleprimes site I believe it would be impossible to find such a post where on the old mapleprimes it would be viewable in order last answer added to the post. 

FONT SIZES - oooweeee - can we multiply that size by 0.25 or something? 

a:=convert(NewMapleprimesSite,Array);
b:=0.25*a

In my opinion some work needs to be done on the new mapleprimes.  It's not very user friendly to me anyway.  Do other people testing the site like it as it is now?