that sounds nice alex. The many solutions shown by Edgard

surpasses my math knowledge. I will learn about them and

se what is the best solution for me. Thanks a lot guys!

.... best ...

that sounds nice alex. The many solutions shown by Edgard

surpasses my math knowledge. I will learn about them and

se what is the best solution for me. Thanks a lot guys!

.... best ...

Hi, thanks ... but is it possible to simplify it?

simplify(z*hypergeom([1/t, 1/t], [(t+1)/t], -(z*a)^t), hypergeom), assuming t > 0, t < 1, a > 0, a < 1;

or

`assuming`([convert(z*hypergeom([1/t, 1/t], [(t+1)/t], -(z*a)^t), StandardFunctions)], [t > 0, t < 1, a > 0, a < 1])

gives nothing!? I cannt go further ... ?!

W'd be greatful for any help!

oxy

Hi, thanks ... but is it possible to simplify it?

simplify(z*hypergeom([1/t, 1/t], [(t+1)/t], -(z*a)^t), hypergeom), assuming t > 0, t < 1, a > 0, a < 1;

or

`assuming`([convert(z*hypergeom([1/t, 1/t], [(t+1)/t], -(z*a)^t), StandardFunctions)], [t > 0, t < 1, a > 0, a < 1])

gives nothing!? I cannt go further ... ?!

W'd be greatful for any help!

oxy

thx... it does get solved!

thx... it does get solved!