Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw
 

Download Adomian.Elisha2.mw

PDE := diff(u(x, t), t$2) = (1/16)*(diff(u(x, t), x$2))-(1/5)*(diff(u(x, t), t)); IBCs := u(x, 0) = x*(1-(1/2)*x), (D[2](u))(x, 0) = x*(1-(1/2)*x), u(0, t) = 0, (D[1](u))(1, t) = 0; Sol := pdsolve({IBCs, PDE}, HINT = f(x)*g(t)); Sol := subs(op([2, 2, 1], Sol) = n, Sol)

I thought that the addition of HINT wolud help but no.

The numeric solution gives the right answer but the analytical gives way too small numbers and wrong shape.

I have a list of coefficients each assigned a triple of indices. E.g. CF_{x,y,z}. These indicies are also able to take other values between +-2. E.g. CF_{x+2,y-1,z} or CF_{x,y-2,z+1} as examples. I have a working loop that cycles through the list of these coefficients and I am able to call a particular one by specifying the triple of indicies. This script has been attached:

triple_index_script.mw

I would like to modify this script to have more control over single indexes. As an example, say I want to add up all the coefficients which have z as a subscript (so not z+1,z-2 etc...) and I don't care what the x and y subscripts are; I want to be able to call that sum using the same notation in the script but with a single index. e.g. (using a new example function called RR_MapZ):

RR_MapZ[0]; ## This would return the sum of all coefficients that had z in their subscript

and this would return the sum of all the coefficients which have subscript Z. If I wanted to add up all the coefficients which had index Z+1 I would do:

RR_MapN[1]; ## This would return the sum of all coefficients that had z+1 in their subscript

What would be the most efficient way to do this?

-Yeti

Hi everybody

In the attached file, when I run the code an error appears while calculating "omegaL1" parameter. The dimensions of the matrices are correct but the source of error is unknown to me. Can anyone help me?

Thanks in advance

R2_Link_2D.mw 

Is there any convenient tool to convert Maple worksheet to Matlab m file, until today?

This must have a simple answer but I have been unable to figure it out after many attempts. 

I am trying to create a Clifford algebra, and then use the results in the multiplication table "MT". The multiplication table elements are correct as displayed, but I don't know how to access the results in the table (i.e. the products of the basis elements).  For example, trying to access the table results as matrix elements like MT[2,3] doesn't work, presumably because it is not a matrix. In other words, I need a matrix that contains the same information as the multiplication table.

DGsetup([x, y, z], M);
I12 := Matrix([[-1, 0, 0], [0, -1, 0], [0, 0, -1]]);
AD3b := AlgebraLibraryData("Clifford(3)", Cl3Q, quadraticform = I12);
DGsetup(AD3b, '[e0, e1, e2, e3, e12, e13, e23, e123]', '[omega]');
MT := MultiplicationTable(Cl3Q, "AlgebraTable");

hello, i have problem here.

> restart;
> with(linalg);
> NULL;
> fungsi1 := sum(d1[h]+b1[h], h = 1 .. 7);
> fungsi2 := sum(sum(d2[h, t]+b2[h, t], t = 1 .. 23), h = 1 .. 7);
> fungsi3 := sum(sum(d3[h, t]+b3[h, t], t = 1 .. 23), h = 1 .. 7);
> fungsi4 := sum(d4[k]+b4[k], k = 1 .. 3);
> fungsi := fungsi1+fungsi2+fungsi3+fungsi4;
> NULL;
> NULL;
> k1 := seq(sum(X[h, t], t = 1 .. 23) >= 9, h = 1 .. 6);
> k2 := seq(sum(Y[h, t], t = 1 .. 23) >= 2, h = 1 .. 6);
> k3 := seq(sum(Z[h, t], t = 1 .. 23) >= 2, h = 1 .. 6);
> NULL;
> k4 := seq(seq(X[h, t]+Y[h, t]+Z[h, t] <= 1, h = 1 .. 6), t = 1 .. 23);
> NULL;
> k5 := seq(seq(Z[h, t]+Z[h+1, t] <= 1, h = 1 .. 6), t = 1 .. 23);
> NULL;
> k6 := seq(sum(X[h, t]+Y[h, t]+Z[h, t], t = 1 .. 23) >= 5, h = 1 .. 7);
> k7 := seq(sum(X[h, t]+Y[h, t]+Z[h, t], t = 1 .. 23) <= 6, h = 1 .. 7);
> NULL;
> k8 := seq(sum(X[h, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b1[h]-d1[h] <= 15, h = 1 .. 6);
> k9 := seq(sum(Y[h, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b1[h]-d1[h] <= 4, h = 1 .. 6);
> k10 := seq(sum(Z[h, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b1[h]-d1[h] <= 4, h = 1 .. 6);
> NULL;
> k11 := seq(seq(Y[h, t]+Y[h+1, t]+b2[h, t]-d2[h, t] <= 1, t = 1 .. 23), h = 1 .. 6);
> NULL;
> k12 := seq(seq(Z[h, t]+Z[h+1, t]+b3[h, t]-d3[h, t] <= 1, t = 1 .. 23), h = 1 .. 6);
> NULL;
> k13 := sum(X[7, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b4[1]-d4[1] = 2;
> k14 := sum(Y[7, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b4[1]-d4[1] = 2;
> k15 := sum(Z[7, t], t = 1 .. 23)+b4[1]-d4[1] = 2;
> with(Optimization);
[ImportMPS, Interactive, LPSolve, LSSolve, Maximize, Minimize, 

  NLPSolve, QPSolve]
> CodeTools:-Usage(LPSolve(fungsi, {k1, k10, k11, k12, k13, k14, k15, k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7, k8, k9}, assume = {integer, nonnegative}));
Error, (in Optimization:-LPSolve) no feasible point found for LP subproblem
> 
why it can be? please i need help. 

I was looking to see if anyone has come across a Maple routine for a savings algorithm - specifically, Clarke and Wright. In fact, any classical savings heuristic would also be interesting.

Any guidance would be truly appreciated.

Is it possible get a solution of this equation without RoofOf in form explicit?

 Question:- can the procedure given below called "epi" be speeded up by compiling/ using evhf.If so how? My paple code is at the bottom.

First some background information.

Recently I ran into a difference in usage of a couple of elliptical functions between Maple and Mathematica.  This first case concerned EllipticalPi. The author of the blog kindly wrote  a Maple procedure to produce the same results as Mathematica’s  usage of ElllipticalPi.

I tested the basic integral that produces the EllipticPi    Ell := int(1/(1-nu*JacobiSN(t, k)^2), t)  answer      Ell := EllipticPi(JacobiSN(t, k), nu, k). They do not produce the same outcome. Plots are in the document .  They agree in one quarter only.

 I then ran into a difference in usage of  EllipticF. This time I was able to get to same outcome myself using Maple’s help.

“It is worth noting the difference between the Legendre normal form of the Incomplete Elliptic integral of the first kind (see A&S 17.2.7), in Maple represented by EllipticF(z,k) but for the splitting of the square root in the denominator of the integrand (see definition lines above), and the normal trigonometric form of this elliptic integral (see A&S 17.2.6), in Maple represented by the InverseJacobiAM function
InverseJacobiAM(phi,k);

That worked fine.

There is no mention in the help for usage implementation of EllipticPi as opposed to different usages as there is with EllipticF. I do not know if there is a way in Maple of achieving the same enactment as Mathematica in this case, without the Procedure I  was  given.

Elliptic Pi in Mathematica and Maple

Posted on 2017/02/202017/02/23 by arkajad

We use EllipticPi when we write exact solutions of rotation of a free asymmetric top. While solving Euler’s equations for angular velocity or angular momentum in the body frame we need Jacobi elliptic functions solving the differential equation for the attitude matrix involves EllipticPi function. As I have explained it in Taming the T-handle continued we need the integral

(1)  

In Mathematica this is easily implemented as

(2)  

However, as pointed out by Rowan in a comment to Taming the T-handle continued , the same formula does not work with Maple.

While the documentations of both Mathematica and Maple contain links to Abramowitz and Stegun Handbook of Mathematical Functions, they use different definitions. Here is what concerns us, from p. 590 of the 10th printing:

What we need is 17.2.16, while Maple is using 17.2.14. To convert we need to set but such a conversion is possible only in the domain where can be inverted. We can do it easily for sufficiently small values of but not necessarily for values that contain several quarter-periods.

The following Maple procedure does the job:

epi := proc (t::float, nu::float, k::float) local t2, n, dt, ep0, res; ep0 := EllipticPi(nu, k); t2 := EllipticK(k); n := floor(t/t2); dt := t-t2*n; if type(n, even) then res := Re(n*ep0+EllipticPi(JacobiSN(dt, k), nu, k)) else res := Re((1+n)*ep0-EllipticPi(JacobiSN(t2-dt, k), nu, k)) end if end proc

HAs an example here is the Maple plot for nu=-3, k=0.9:
plot(('epi')(t, -3.0, .9), t = -20 .. 20)

And here is the corresponding Mathematica plot:

The function epi(t,nu, k) defined above for Maple gives now the same result as EllipticPi(nu,JacobiAM(t,k^2),k^2) in Mathematica.

restart;
epi := proc (t, nu, k) local t2, n, dt, ep0, res; ep0 := EllipticPi(nu, k); t2 := EllipticK(k); n := floor(t/t2); dt := t-t2*n; if type(n, even) then res := Re(n*ep0+EllipticPi(JacobiSN(dt, k), nu, k)) else res := Re((1+n)*ep0-EllipticPi(JacobiSN(t2-dt, k), nu, k)) end if end proc;

Ell := int(1/(1-nu*JacobiSN(t, k)^2), t);
            Ell := EllipticPi(JacobiSN(t, k), nu, k)
k := .9;
                            k := 0.9
nu := -3;
                            nu := -3
plot([epi(t, nu, k), Ell], t = -8 .. 20);

Dear All,

This is probably an easy issue to solve.

I have imported an .xls file using the 1D lookup table.

I need the signal to be executed for 4 seconds which is also how long my simulation duration is.

So I set the Ramp height and rise time to 4s. For some reason when I display the signal using a probe it gives me the constant value of the first row of my Excel sheet. I need help to solve this! I have provided some visuals below.

Thank you for your time!

Can

I have two figures that's generated in Maple (by plot), then pasted them to a worksheet, which I would like to export them to PDF format with exactly the same as it seems on Maple, meaning that these two figures need to be on the same row.

However, in the exported PDF, these two figures are always in two rows: see Fig_1.mw and Fig_1.pdf 

What I tried was: to really resize these two figures into very small size, and the export works, however, I also need three figures or four figures in one row. See Fig_2.mw and Fig_2.pdf

So there is actually two questions:

1. Can I specify some parameters in Maple such that the exported PDF is exactly 'what I see is what I get'?

2. If #1 is impossible, where can I get the information on: width of the exported PDF, how to specify the precise size of plot command etc

Thanks,

How to express a chemistry equation in prefix expression

Hi everyone!

I would really appreciate if someone could give me a hand on telling me what is wrong with this problem! pdsolve gives the error: Error, (in pdsolve/sys/info) found functions with same name but depending on different arguments in the given DE system: {f(0, y), f(x, 0), f(x, y), (D[2](f))(0, y), (D[2](f))(x, 0)}.


Thanks in advance!!! 

Hello,

I want to check via Maple whether the term is always bigger than c/4 (it is), but using verify(TERM, c/4, greater_than) just returns FALSE. I did assume(a > 0, b > 0, -1 <= c and c <= 1); It would be nice if you could tell me what exactly is causing the problem and how to solve it.

Thanks in advance

(9*a^3*b^3*c^2+4*a^6*c+16*a^5*b*c+47*a^4*b^2*c+82*a^3*b^3*c+47*a^2*b^4*c+16*a*b^5*c+4*b^6*c+16*a^5*b+80*a^4*b^2+132*a^3*b^3+80*a^2*b^4+16*a*b^5)*(a+2*b)^2*(a+b)^2*(2*a+b)^2/((4*a^6+28*a^5*b+77*a^4*b^2+106*a^3*b^3+77*a^2*b^4+28*a*b^5+4*b^6)*sqrt(-9*a^2*b^2*c^2+32*a^3*b*c+62*a^2*b^2*c+32*a*b^3*c+16*a^4+80*a^3*b+132*a^2*b^2+80*a*b^3+16*b^4)*sqrt(-9*a^4*b^4*c^2+24*a^6*b^2*c+28*a^5*b^3*c-14*a^4*b^4*c+28*a^3*b^5*c+24*a^2*b^6*c+16*a^8+112*a^7*b+276*a^6*b^2+296*a^5*b^3+220*a^4*b^4+296*a^3*b^5+276*a^2*b^6+112*a*b^7+16*b^8))